I know we have a few photo buffs online. Anyone have experience with either one of these cameras?
SD1000 <-- clickie
SD800 <--- clickie
Printable View
I've heard that people like the 800 IS better for the IS part (Image Stabilization). If you plan on a lot of shots w/o a tripod, I'd get it over the 1000.
When I bought my Sony last summer, I strongly considered the equivalent size/shape Canons (previous generation of the models you're looking at). Even though I HATE Sony (just ask Dave04), I bought one.
Did you see this months Consumer Guides they had a write up on P&S cameras, but I haven't looked at it yet.
We have an older Cannon and it's been a great camera, we were actually talking about getting a newer one before our big vacation this summer.
I was told the only thing IS does is up the ISO. Typically not good in a P&S camera.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Payrot
Which one did you buy?Quote:
Originally Posted by tailchaser
Yes I saw it, it's 1 page in the May 07 issue. Not much info IMO. A bigger review is coming in July 07, but I don't want to wait that long.Quote:
Originally Posted by POS Racing
DSC-W70Quote:
Originally Posted by sammm
I like the new W90 in terms of ergonomics... they made it harder to accidentally turn the selector dial.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammm
I like the size of the camera. At 7.1 mega pixels, it should bring a really good image quality.Quote:
From Popular Photography Sept 06
The 7.1 megapixel SD800 IS Digital ELPH camera is the second and newest Optical Image Stabilized Digital ELPH model in the PowerShot line, and is now the top-of-the-line Digital ELPH IS entry. Canon based the optical image stabilization system on advancements made in the development of the company’s EF and video lenses, and then scaled it down to fit the diminutive Digital ELPH camera profile. Unlike electronic or “digital image stabilization systems” that typically degrade image quality, Canon’s lens shift-type stabilization system preserves maximum optical quality while providing up to three stops of shake correction in shutter speed equivalent.
Here's another review from Popular Photography:
Linkie
One word...
www.kenrockwell.com
I've been reading his site....and he states, "The Canon SD800 is the pocket camera to get".Quote:
Originally Posted by Ataim
I am trying to decide if IS is worth an extra $100 (basically the diff. between the SD800 and SD1000. The other is the SD800 can go 28mm wide, while the SD1000 is 35mm like most others)
the IS is easily worth $100... as is the jump from 35 to 28. If you like the feel of the camera, you'll be happy.Quote:
Originally Posted by sammm
A highly objective review
I've used the 700IS quite a bit. It has the 3.8x zoom and the IS. Both are very nice features to have. Overall, it's a great camera, and the size makes it easy to carry everywhere. It's a 6MP cam, and outdoor shots are fantastic. It's also pretty responsive for a point-n-shoot digital camera.
My only complaint is that the flash is *just barely* better than no flash at all. If you need to take lots of indoor shots, you may be disappointed in the picture quality. Admittedly, it's not my personal cam, and I haven't spent much time trying different settings to improve things. But it's supposed to be a point-n-shoot, right? I've used a number of other cameras (though none quite as small) with an onboard flash that is much better.
Having said that, I like it well enough that a Canon SD-something or other is a the top of my list for an ultra-compact digital camera... YMMV
I never use the flash on my SD, I've learned to use the manual setting and compensate for lack of light with the various settings. Not very many compact P&S have decent flash, if any, due to the size restraints. Canon does make an external flash for the newer SD series though.
Thanks for the info guys. I pulled the trigger on the SD800 this afternoon. Free 2-day shipping from Amazon, so I should have it this Wednesday.
Guess what showed up in the mail today? (after I ordered of course) The July 07 Consumer Reports with the digital camera reviews. :rolleyes: