I'm at the age where I can't see close-up with my glasses on (I'm nearsighted), but can read fine without my glasses.
If I get LASIK, I'll need reading glasses for up-close work (reading, etc.), but for nothing else at this point.
What would you do?
Printable View
I'm at the age where I can't see close-up with my glasses on (I'm nearsighted), but can read fine without my glasses.
If I get LASIK, I'll need reading glasses for up-close work (reading, etc.), but for nothing else at this point.
What would you do?
Lasers ftw!
I still think glasses are cool, don't know why either.
I've been considering the LASIK and I'm just nearsighted... I know about half a dozen folks who have done it and think it's the best decision they ever made.
On the other hand, my Dad had to get bi-focals a few years back and I'm still hearing him swear (@#$ @#$ @#$ ) about them.
So I'd say go LASIK ...
If you're going to have to keep up with glasses anyway, why risk your sight?
I know, this is all safe and they hardly ever have a problem, but eyesight is one of my favorite things.
Besides, look at the cost you CB!!!
LASIK is great. Have you asked about mono-vision?
Me neither. :confused: (I'm very tired of wearing glasses)
It wouldn't be 100% of the time and they would be $5 WallyWorld reading glasses.
Tried that with contacts years ago. Made me dizzy (more than usual).
I'm loving the LASIK!
It is my understanding (when I left the Optician field) even with Lasik you will still need reading glasses in the future.
I have seen some patients that had botched surgery and I personally would never do it because there is a chance you could be far worse off than when you started.
most people enjoy success but there is a chance.
Oh also as mentioned there is mono vision if bothe eyes are about the same strength this usually works with an adjustment period but if one eye is way worse than the other....that is when most people can't adjust.
I'm gonna have to agree with onething on this. I'm nearly in the same situation; with my contacts I've got 20/15 vision (which rocks) but can't focus closer than a foot away. Uncorrected I can't focus more than 6-8 inches away. I've worn glasses since I was 10 so I don't see the appeal of trading nearsightedness for farsightedness.
I agree with onething and Darron65. I was farsighted and had to wear reading glasses, my eyes are dissimilar enough that I could not use the $5 Wal-Mart glasses. I got tired of keeping up with those reading glasses. I was happy when I finally started to wear bi-focals. Now I need to wear tri-focals. No way could LASIK help me.
I would not have traded my farsightedness for nearsightedness. You still have to keep up with a pair of glasses.
My opinion is that you should stay with your glasses, forget the LASIK.
Having had LASIK, I can tell you that I would do it again in a heartbeat. The fact that I don't have to root around for my glasses in the morning, squint to shave my mug, or the ability to wear a sweet pair of Ray-Ban sunglasses is amazing.
Sure you take your chances... but if you do your research, ask questions, and check out the MD's reputations for quality work, then most of the worries should be alleviated.
I dig it the most - I've got 20/15 in both eyes. Yes, we'll all need reading glasses at some point in our lives - the eyes get old and lose some of their tautness, but it's a fact of life that we will all most likely face. I'll wait until then to pick up a pair of nice reading glasses... for now however, my choice is crystal clear.
The money I spent on LASIK was some of the best money I have ever spent. I, too, would do it again in a heartbeat. It really is that great.
Then let's fire up the Laser! ::Banana::
http://images.jupiterimages.com/comm...8/22859898.jpg
Just be sure that the place you end up using is a totally blade free joint. Blade-less quickens your recovery time.
Check for shakey hands, too. Same goes for selecting a mohel.
I went with the guys that don't advertise. Every time I go I meet with the same doctor, the very guy that did the job. My buddy Lee went to Boothe and never met the man except for 15 seconds while actually on the laser.
I never needed Valium or any other type of major pain killer - some ibuprofen and I was right as rain. The biggest pain in the ass is the headache afterwards but it went away fairly quickly.
So what are ya'll paying for your Lasik?
The LASIK does not guarantee 20/20 vision! It can under or over correct. Chances they you will still need bifocal. At your age, your prescription for your nearsight possible will remain stable. However, there is outside chance that it will change and your 20/20 vision from this surgery may not be correct 5 to 10 years down the road. You will end up where you are now.
Sammm, every expert on this board has an opinion about LASIK. I suggest that you listen to those that have received the treatment in regards to their own satisfaction. For everything else, consult a physician. I urge you to attend one or two free seminars. Tylock (who did mine) has one in Irving. There is another guy in Hurst off Norwood and Harwood (I think) that also has seminars. Attend a couple of those, find a doc you like, and if you are ready, jump in -- the water's great! Feel free to talk to me about my experience with this.
There is a Dr. I used to work with in fact he was the best that I worked with in my 15 years as a certified Optician, young sharp and does Lasik pre and post op care he can evaluate and reccomend a GOOD surgeon and give you the facts...just let me know.
I'm just glad people don't still do RK, talk about dangerous!
But the bottom line is just because the people on this forum have enjoyed success it doesn't mean you will it is important to know that there IS a real risk, and all the "mine worked fine" fades away when you have a complication like fuzzy vision or auras.
Haveing worked in all aspects of the Optical industry including managing, qc lab, retail and medical side, and working with Opthamologists....believe me, there is a risk.
I have been nearsighted since i was a little kid. After 21 years the concept of wearing glasses got a little old. After doing some research and having read a few of the LASIK threads on this board, I decided to take the plunge.
I got blade-free LASIK on November 31st and I think it was some of the best money spent. It cost me about $3800. I had a pretty strong perscription in both eyes (-5.5 R / -5.75 L) and now I'm enjoying 20/15 in my right eye and slightly better than 20/20 in my left one. I still get slight halos around lights at night, but not any worse than I did with glasses.
Like Bean said it's nice not to have to fummble around for glasses in the morining just to see the alarm clock. I really like the whole concept of being able to see the world with my own eyes, unaided by any contraptions sitting on my face.
I had to get PRK in one eye because of a physical anomally. The LASIK eye was good to go by dinner the day of the surgery. The PRK eye took about three days.
Having my initial consultation at 4pm today. :D
Where at?
By the way, if you're going to Clearview in Southlake, tell them I sent you... perhaps they may discount it a bit.
It went OK. He suggested monovision correction for me since I already have presbyopia. I'm still deciding what I'm going to do. If I do get monovision and decide I don't like it, it can be corrected/changed for distance correction.
Interesting (to me at least) thread on SCCA forums...
http://sccaforums.com/forums/thread/228640.aspx