Vorshlag Scion FR-S LSx Alpha Project

Project Introduction - April 12th, 2014: This is the first of many posts where we will document our first GM LSx based V8 swap into an "FT86" chassis, or just an "86". That's the Scion FR-S and Subaru BRZ rear wheel drive sports coupe, for those of you unfamiliar with the nickname. Also known as "the twins", these two-door coupes are a co-creation from Toyota (ne Scion) and Subaru, and a revolutionary design for them both. These are two companies normally making plebeian FWD econoboxes (Toyota) or plebeian AWD econoboxes (Subaru) - and together they made this completely different car!

This introductory post is a big one, so you might want to go grab a snack before you start reading...

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag..._DSC7950-L.jpg

Some call it the modern day Miata coupe, which it really is in some ways, but not in others. True, it is a relatively lightweight 2 seater (there is a faux back seat) with a hard top coupe chassis, which the Miata never got, but should have. The power-to-weight ratio is similar to the MX5 Miata, meaning pretty poor. But it does give those "pure" sports car feelings, and some would argue that a "pure" sports car is always a light RWD 2 seater with lower power but good handling and gearing.

Well, we beg to differ. An enjoyable sports car is anything with RWD, good handling, good brakes, and a GOOD power-to-weight ratio. The formula is simple: Lightweight, big power, rear drive, make it turn and stop. And the FR-S/BRZ chassis almost fits that bill, but it has a few glaring holes that we aim to fill.

What's Going in and Why?

Before you wonder what we are doing in this project, I will give you the quick summary: a customer brought us a 2013 Scion FR-S with a turbocharged FA20 motor, this car had several "major engine problems" previously, and now we are swapping in an all aluminum LSx GM V8 engine and a manual transmission strong enough to take it into this chassis. This LSx V8 swap will add a lot of engine displacement and horsepower, and some much needed powertrain reliability, yet still allow for affordable upgrade path for the future. This Alpha FR-S LSx will be used for both street driving and road course use, and already has some track oriented upgrades such as StopTech brakes, 17x9" wheels, racing seats, aftermarket axles, a roll bar, and a rear seat delete.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3052-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7592-S.jpg
Out with the old 2.0L engine, in with the big honkin' V8!

Before we get to the "why a V8 swap?!?" question, let's look at this chassis as it comes from the factory. This Rear Wheel Drive coupe was introduced in 2012 as a '13 model year car and has been a popular car for people that liked the small, sporty handling of a RWD 2 seater like the Mazda MX5 but wanted a roomier interior, a much more rigid chassis via the hard top coupe design, and a nominal back seat. These cars are available as the Subaru BRZ and Scion FR-S (as well as the Toyota GT86 in other markets outside the USA).

This chassis was jointly designed by Subaru and Toyota, and it shows, with some of the quirkiness from both companies survived in this final design. And a lot of "parts bin" engineering solutions, but that is going to happen on most lower volume cars like this. Some bad ideas managed to stick around, which we will address in this build. Many more details of this new-for-2013 model chassis are well documented on the interweb and we've talked about it extensively on our 2013 BRZ Project Build Thread (linked here).

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Cars/Sub.../DSC8033-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E..._DSC4935-S.jpg

In that thread we document what we felt were many of the shortcomings on the OEM FT86 models and show our numerous fixes, updates and suggestions to make them better. We show parts we bought, built, or designed to make these cars stop, turn and go better. Things like replacing the underwhelming OEM tire and wheel package, upgrading the super soft springs and suspension bushings, and fitting some proper monotube coilover dampers and camber plates up front.

Many thousands of FT86 owners have agreed that these cars work better with a few mods and the aftermarket has grown quickly for this chassis, with many offerings available to upgrade the wheels, tires, brakes, dampers, spring rates, alignment settings, bushings, exhausts, and more. An entire aftermarket segment has sprung up in the past two years to support FT86 buyers. You see it is perfectly normal to want to modify a brand new car, and real gearheads understand that virtually no car is ever built 100% perfectly for everyone from the factory, especially in the first year. The motorsports and enthusiast aftermarket exists simply because the demand to upgrade and modify cars, and the FT86 owners are no different.

An LSx Swap Is Just Another Mod

We see the LSx V8 swap as "just another modification" that can make this car better. Sure, maybe we're just taking the "mods" thing a little further than some, but here at Vorshlag we have done so many LSx V8 swaps on many makes and models of cars that nothing phases us. Not the "its a brand new car!" nor the "How can you make electrical bits work?!". We have lots of happy customers to show for all of that work over the past 12 years that we've been doing these LSx transplants. Swapping motors is fundamentally not any different than folks adding superchargers, turbochargers, or built FA20 motors.

Will swapping in a Corvette V8 motor into an FT86 piss off some purists? Sure it will. Its not "JDM, yo". But we simply don't care about any of that. We are not brand loyalists in any way/shape/form; we simply use "the right tool for the job". Brand loyalty doesn't make a car faster, and ignoring this obvious engine upgrade prohibits 86 owners from these most affordable and reliable powerplant alternative on the market. Is this "brand loyalty snob" pushback something we've run across before? Of course. The BMW community was pretty cold to the idea of an LS1 V8 in a Bimmer when we first showed it in 2002, but many warmed up after they saw, heard and rode in the "hybrid" brand V8 powered cars we created and we are quickly approaching our 100th BMW LSx V8 swap sold this year.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC8318-L.jpg
This V8 powered BMW E36 M3 with a Vorshlag swap kit makes 420 whp on pump gas and 5.7 Liters of LS1 goodness

The simplicity, reliability, low weight, compact size, aftermarket support, power potential, and just RAW POWER of the OHV aluminum LSx V8 is hard to ignore. Since the early 2000s these "LS1 swaps" have become very popular in virtually any car it is stuck into: the 240SX, multiple generations of RX7, various Miatas, BMWs, classic muscle cars - you name it. And we've made a good dent in the BMW purists' armor, selling so many E36 and E46 LS1 swap kits over the past 12 years. Lots of folks with street or race prepped BMWs are running around on LSx power with help from Vorshlag.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag...074865_n-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag...854426_n-S.jpg

So don't look at this project and think, "What drugs are these guys on?!" There is a method to our madness, and lots of proven V8 swap packages on the roads due to the hard work we've done to develop them. There are also millions of all aluminum LSx motors just sitting around in wrecked GM cars and trucks that we can pick these motors from. This makes the LSx engine prices affordable, and with tens of millions of this engine family produced since 1996 (and still being built to this day) the market for go-fast parts for this engine is MASSIVE.

There Are Many Things That Can Be Upgraded on the FT86

We've done a lot of work on this FT86 chassis here at Vorshlag, including: developing camber plates for it, co-developing the MCS coilovers using our in-house 2013 BRZ, as well as performed track and autocross upgrades on multiple examples of 86 coupes. We've done big brake kits (however - these cars usually don't need this), pad swaps, made our own stainless brake lines, brake cooling ducts, lots of different coilover installs, bushings, swaybars, exhausts, control arm swaps, tons of wheel and tire testing, and much more. We know this chassis inside and out.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC5301-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E...DSC_9782-S.jpg

We have tracked and autocrossed multiple examples of the FT86, including former Vorshlag employee Matt's blue BRZ, shown here. These cars are quite fun to drive in autocross or HPDE/Time Trial, once you perform a few basic modifications.

continued below

continued from above

We feel that the OEM 7" wide wheels and 215mm Prius tires are extremely undersized and underwhelming, but after upgrading to a 17x9" wheel and aggressive 255/40/17 street tire these things can make huge grip. The stock ride heights are also a bit too tall and the spring rates too soft for any serious track use, so we tend to go straight to coilovers (like those from MCS) and firmer spring and damping rates, then add our spherical top mount camber plates up front for alignment and handling adjustments. We've also have had good results installing Whiteline bushings and swaybars, among other solutions.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...copy%202-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E...8%20copy-S.jpg

Anyway, the 86 is a neat little chassis, which can be made to handle very well with the right parts, and with an upgrade to better track brake pads/lines/fluid they stop like a beast on track as well. Read our BRZ project build thread for more on our thoughts about the brakes and suspension, which we won't really cover in this thread.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...16MG5102-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...6%20copy-S.jpg
This thread is not about: suspension, wheels, tires or handling. What we are covering here is a better choice of POWER PLANT for the 86

After those non-power things are addressed, our number one beef with the Scion FR-S and Subaru BRZ has to do with the goofy drivetrain it comes with. Yes, goofy is the only way to describe the flat-four engine in these cars. The engine that comes in these things is a giant headache with very limited potential and questionable reliability when modified.

What's So Wrong With The Subaru FA20 Boxer Engine?

We aren't picking on all Subaru engines, just this one. It isn't that much of a hindrance in low speed autocross competition (these cars are doing very well in C Street and STX classes!) but the deficiencies of the FA20 quickly becomes apparent on a road course. These cars are what you'd euphemistically call "momentum cars"... since they don't make nearly enough horsepower for the weight of the chassis, once you try to get going above about 30 mph. I say the same thing about all stock-engined Miatas, among other cars. These momentum cars are better suited running with the Miata run group on a road course, as the Mustangs, Corvettes, 911s and other powerful cars are going to be flying by your FT86 (if those other guys have a good driver, of course - no amount of power can make up for a lack of talent!)

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Cars/Sub.../DSC8022-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3053-S.jpg

The Subaru built FA20 / Toyota 4U-GSE 2.0L "flat-4" (aka: boxer) direct injected 200 hp engine that comes in these cars is a novel piece of engineering, I suppose. It has a "low center of gravity" layout and all that, but it is also a staggering 31" wide. This is really one big ass little engine. It is so wide that the frame rails had to be pushed way out there, but even so the clearance between the cylinder heads and the frame is tight. I suppose you can remove the spark plugs without pulling the engine, but it looked tight. This layout reminds me of Porsche 911 repair nightmares (which has a similarly wide flat-6 engine).

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3048-L.jpg

The engine block is short front-to-back (only 18" long) but it is placed in the engine bay way too far forward. So far, in fact, that more than 1/2 of the mass of the engine is in front of the front axle centerline. This is very strange, and I cannot say why the Subaru and Toyota engineers that designed this chassis and drivetrain placed the engine so far forward. They even had to use an extra long bellhousing and a crazy long shifter extension on back of the transmission to get the gear shift lever far enough rearward to mate up with the driver in the cockpit. My calibrated engineer's eyeball says this stock motor could be moved back by another ~10", which would help the front to rear weight balance significantly; in stock form we measured 56% of the weight on the front wheels, and our Alpha tester's modded FR-S has a 55%F/46%R weight bias.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2893-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2895-S.jpg
Rick's FR-S came to us with a turbo kit, StopTech BBK, rear seat removed, a 4-point roll bar and racing seats installed, weighing 2682 lbs

So the engine is super wide, and fore-aft engine placement of this lump is not great - it could have been improved with just a little bit of effort. In my opinion this car was really built from a lot of older carryover Subaru parts and technology... Subaru GR design in the back, some Subaru GD front suspension design, a traditional forward biased engine layout (things like the starter, that sits way up high and would have interfered with the firewall if it was set back, would have had to be redesigned and moved down below), and all wrapped in some pretty new bodywork. Hey, it is economics, I get it... to totally design a 100% all new RWD coupe from scratch would have cost so much more, and that would have driven up the car's price. One of the saving graces of this chassis is the low cost: The FR-S starts at $24,500 sticker and the Subaru BRZ starts at $25,495.

continued below

continued from above

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2900-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3066-S.jpg

The engineers did do a lot of things right: it is a proper Rear Wheel Drive car, it has a rigid coupe chassis, the interior is roomy for those of tall stature, the seats are excellent, visibility is pretty good, and driver ergonomics are excellent (placement and adjustabilty of the seat, steering wheel, pedals, shifter, and other controls). Still, the specific examples of engineering compromises are numerous and the FT86 chassis contains many examples of when "the bean counters win out over the engineers". We're here to fix some of those compromises, to make a great little sports car into an EXCELLENT sports car with some serious track credentials.

The saving grace of the FA 20 engine is the height: this lump is a lot shorter than an average upright inline-4 or V-configuration engines, with the bulky DOHC cylinder heads sitting very low down in the chassis. That is all this engine does add - a lower center of gravity. But low weight isn't what this unusual engine layout offers, not hardly. As you can see below, we've already weighed the stock FA20 engine and transmission at 480 pounds. This is, by far, the heaviest 4-cylinder aluminum engine we've ever weighed.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7750-L.jpg
Weight of 2.0L engine and 5-spd transmission is 493 pounds with a 13 pound dolly; the aftermarket turbo was removed

There are other things about the Subaru flat 4 engine that are unusual. With only 4 cylinders it still has an inordinate amount of parts and complexity: 4 camshafts, 2 cylinder heads, lots of cam drive chains and tensioners, and the block has to be split in half to disassemble the connecting rods and other internals. The compression ratio of the FA20 engine is also very high at 12.5:1, an uncommonly high value for a production gasoline engine. This means you have to run Premium (high octane) fuel and adding forced induction (super- or turbocharging) is a very risky proposition. The saving grace is the Toyota designed Direct Injection fuel system, which uses very high fuel line pressure and injects fuel directly into the combustion chamber (diesel engines went to this type of direct fuel injection a long time ago). These new "Gasoline Direct Injection" (aka: DI) systems tend to add 5-10% more power and 10-20% extra fuel efficiency over a more common "low pressure" (45-60 psi) port fuel injection system, and its how they can get away with that much cylinder compression. But since these DI systems are so new they are difficult to tune, upgrade and modify. Even the factory Toyota system used on the 86 includes a second set of "port fuel injectors", to help with low engine speeds and cold start problems (see this video for a better explanation of the factory DI and PI systema)

All this high tech wizardry doesn't magically make this 2 liter engine produce awesome levels of power, however. Even the 1999-era Honda S2000's F20C engine made 240 hp with 2 liters, normal pressure EFI, and 11:1 compression. The 2013 FR-S makes 200 hp with the same displacement, Direct Injection and a higher compression ratio. When measured the FA20 is making about 160-170 whp, and the chassis dyno measurement shown below on one of our tester's stock 2013 BRZ is typical.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...-2013brz-L.jpg
The stock horsepower numbers are something an FT86 owner is never going to brag about

The blue test car we worked with in 2012-13 made a best dyno pull of 167 whp (measured at the rear wheels on a DynoJet chassis dyno) in stock form, and with a measured curb weight of 2775 pounds (+ 200 for a driver like me) to push around, that makes for a 17.8:1 pounds per hp ratio, which I'll round up to 18:1. Pounds per hp is a common number that racers look at, as many road racing classes have strict limits there. Our NASA TT3 prepped 2011 Mustang has to conform to an 8.8:1 pounds per hp ratio, giving us twice the horsepower for each pound we haul around compared to an FR-S/BRZ.

That 18:1 power to weight ratio is more inline with an early 1990s 1.8L Miata. For some folks, that's perfectly fine. For others, they need more power to create the higher acceleration rates that lead to more thrills, and on a road course this is amplified dramatically. Tens of thousands of people have made the comment about the 86 twins that they need more power. We've had dozens of owners ask us here at Vorshlag "When are you going to make an LS1 swap kit for the 86?" So we had been quietly looking for that perfect "Alpha customer" for the past year and a half.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...t-120812-L.jpg

Each time I have driven these cars on track (see video above), the immense grip levels were notable simply because of their inherent lack of forward thrust the 2 liter boxer engine provides. It goes fairly well, and you can terrorize stock Miatas in a BRZ or FR-S, but that's about it. We've seen so many aftermarket parts pop-up to try to rectify the limited power levels: all manner of headers, cat-back exhausts, cold air kits and other bolt-on doo-dads, custom tunes and even E85 ethanol fuel conversions. All sorts of manufacturers and shops have been trying to unlock more power - but most solutions seem to come up short. There just isn't a lot of "easy" horsepower left to untap on the FA20 engine, and many of the claims of "300 whp!" end up being a bunch of internet hype or turbo ticking time bombs. Even a 200 whp FT86 build is somewhat legendary.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC8162-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC8168-S.jpg
Weight of a bone stock 2013 BRZ Premium package car came in at 2775 pounds on our scale

Why I Hate Boosted Track Cars

The main power solution now coming to market for this chassis includes forced induction kits using either a turbo- and supercharger. I lump both of these Forced Induction (aka: "FI") solutions into the same category, which I often label with the derogatory term "boost buggies". This Alpha build FR-S came in to our shop with an turbo kit installed, and was one of the first Ft86 car's in Texas with this particular kit. I don't know what brand of kit this is, but it almost doesn't matter - as these FI kits will all suffer the same fates in the 12.5:1 compression ratio FA20 motor. Detonation and premature engine failure until the engine is modified with new pistons that can lower the compression ratio.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2903-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2906-S.jpg
When the lowest part of your track-built car is the turbocharger and engine oil line, trouble awaits

The layout of this particular turbo kit was less than ideal, in my opinion, especially for track use. The turbocharger was mounted low, underneath the engine, and both the turbo housing and the oil feed line to it were the lowest parts on the chassis. There was also an electric oil pump for the turbo oil feed. This would mean than an off-track excursion could easily rip the oil line off or damage the turbocharger first, which could turn into an expensive mistake. This car was supposed to be built as a reliable track car, but this kit pretty much precluded that, as you have had to make the bottom of the car safe for "offs" by adding skid plates, thus making ground clearance even worse. This turbo package and associated tuning also ended up killing two motors - first the stock 12.5:1 motor then a lower compression motor - both of which died on the dyno, according to what we heard. Before the final race prepped turbo motor was ever able to take a single lap on track, the car's owner went looking for a better solution.

continued below

continued from above

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2900-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2904-S.jpg

There's not going to be a blame game here - it was a commercially available turbo kit, but something obviously went awry. Several times. Even without multiple engine failures on the dyno, I think adding a turbo system to a high compression stock motor with cast pistons was always going to be a recipe for disaster. Maybe it would have lived with the final race built motor it received, but we will never know because that motor is no longer in this chassis. There were too many other things wrong with the installation to document, but needless to say, we're going to put it back together the Vorshlag way - with a big naturally aspirated V8 making a reliable 400 whp, a beautiful exhaust system that has a sound that will make you crave it, proper cooling and sub-system solutions, and a distinct lack of zip ties and bailing wire.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/photos/i...-PC6w6Gt-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/photos/i...-bxjL9FK-S.jpg

A Pikes Peak team we sponsored with some suspension bits had decent luck with a turbocharged set-up on their FR-S race car, but it had some serious tuning hiccups and teething pains to deal with before it got to the mountain. For that extreme hill climb you see over 14,000 feet of elevation at the top of the 12 mile race course, and the only way to maintain horsepower at the top of the mountain is with FI or electric power. FI can make up for the lack of air density and electric motors don't ingest air, so they don't care.

But most of us don't race at 14,000 feet, and in most cases a larger displacement naturally aspirated engine is much MUCH more reliable than any FI engine, especially engines that were not FI from the factory. I'm personally not a fan of turbo and supercharger "kits" installed onto stock motors, and I have seen and experienced a lot of bad examples of this first hand. I worked at a tuner shop that specialized in supercharged V8s back in the day and customers were always breaking pistons, head gaskets, and more. The only way to make them live, even on drag/street cars, was with very mild boost levels + a GOOD fuel system + a conservative tune + a very well built motor. That hasn't changed.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag...8%20copy-L.jpg
Vorshlag has worked with FI engines for road course and hill climb use and we understand the REAL challenges to making these reliable

The problem is exacerbated when the car/motor in question never came from the factory as a turbo model. You see, there is a LOT of engineering and development that goes into building a factory turbocharged car, with all sub-systems getting upgrades to deal with the extra power and HEAT of a boosted engine. To make a non-turbo car into a turbocharged set-up is a lot of additional work to get it reliable. It is so much more than "bolting on the turbo". All sorts of things need to be insulated and re-routed, all fluid systems need beefed up cooling, and heat soak becomes a major issue.

And don't get me started on what it takes to make a turbocharged or supercharged engine car live on a road course. The things you need to make a turbo engine live in drag racing or street use pale in comparison to what you need to do for track use. Everything heat soaks... the turbo housing, the intercooler, the intake manifold, the oil gets cooked... you almost cannot make an intercooler big enough to shed the heat from a turbo to run on a road course for more than a handful of minutes. The intake air temperatures on most turbocharged engines used on a road course keep going up, up, up.... to the point where the pistons eventually melt or something goes BOOM. Even short road course use set-ups like Time Attack and Time Trial face huge hurdles and challenges to keep the motors together and reliable.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E...DSC_2418-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E..._DSC0379-S.jpg
Road course competition in any FI car includes a lot of extra prep and maintenance

So we've explained why an FI build doesn't make sense for this dual purpose street/track car. What is our solution? If you've heard of Vorshlag then you already knew what we had in store before you read anything on this post - swapping in a lightweight V8 engine that will nearly triple the stock displacement. That is a common answer we have to the question of "I need reliable horsepower". Our plan is to use this particular 2013 FR-S as our "Alpha" or first prototype build, then perfect a bolt-in LSx V8 swap kit for FT86 owners to be able to swap in this aluminum V8 motor with as much ease as possible. We always start all new swaps with an Alpha build, which includes the following cars...

• Vorshlag Announcement Thread for all LS1 Swap Development
• BMW E36 LS1 - one of many build threads
• BMW E46 LS1 Alpha
• Mazda NB Miata LS1 Alpha
• First BMW Z3 LS1 Swap
• BMW E30 LSx swap

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects.../DSC5862-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag..._DSC7664-S.jpg
Vorshlag is well known for LS1 swaps in chassis, as well as our production kit components that make installing these V8s easy

If you do some research you will see that Vorshlag has developed and built LS1 V8 swaps for a number of different chassis, and our E36 swap kits are extremely popular with new sub-system parts and products released from 2007-2014. We released our initial "Stage 0" kit (the parts necessary to mount the drivetrain) for the BMW E46 chassis last year and those have also been received very well. We have done a number of other "one off" LS1 swaps such as the BMW E30 LSx that we built for the Grassroots Motorsports $20XX Challenge, which we won overall with in 2011. Then there was the BMW Z3, and we're also need into the development for an NB chassis MX-5 Miata V8 swap kit.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...%20final-L.jpg
The beautiful engine bay of the Z3 LS1 was worth opening the hood to see!

continued below

continued from above

Alpha FR-S LSx Swap Outline

What we have planned is simple and meshes with the customer's needs and the shop that brought him to us. I will give the basics here, and show the step-by-step fabrication and development pictures as the V8 swap kit is developed. We won't give away EVERY detail, as we've had copycats try to duplicate our work over the years. So I won't give away part numbers, finite measurements and the like, but we will show more than enough to let you readers see how we do a new Alpha build.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E..._DSC9576-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E..._DSC9698-S.jpg

The owner of this car is named Rick and he found his was to Texas Track Works in late 2013, a shop in Ft Worth the specializes in track prep, race alignments and more - and is a Vorshlag camber plate dealer. Even though in some ways we are competitors we are we are friends with the staff at Texas Track Works and will partner with them to complete this Alpha build. They are the reason why we have the opportunity to work on this particular FR-S, and for that we are thankful. Rick rode in one of TTW's customer's track/street cars: a Nissan 240SX (above left) with a LS1 swap installed by TTW. We've raced against this car in NASA TT3 in our TT3 Mustang (above right) and that Nissan really scoots. This Nissan is a clean install - unlike some of the hack V8 swaps we've seen built elsewhere, the TTW crew gets the details right and has the race experience to know what matters. After that test ride in that lightweight RWD coupe with proper LSx V8 power, Rick knew what he wanted in his FR-S... LSx V8 power! After that decision it didn't take Texas Track Works long to make the call to us here at Vorshlag, and we came to an agreement: where Vorshlag would cover the development costs of this swap if we could see a way to make it as a kit. So they brought us the car in early January 2014 and we took a look...

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3055-L.jpg

Once the OEM drivetrain and turbo kit were removed we got a closer look at the naked the engine bay. Wow, the underhood area is HUGE! The frame rails are a staggering 31" to 33" wide (they taper in at the back), to house the immense Subaru flat-4 cylinder engine, and I felt immediately that the LSx swap would fit well. We first took a LS1/T56 mock-up drivetrain we keep on hand for swap development and tried to stuff it into the car...

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3315-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3269-S.jpg
Our first LSx V8 + Tremec T56 mock-up had the shifter portion was way too far forward, but we knew what to do.

Hmm, the traditional 1998-2002 Camaro/Firebird Tremec T56 6-spd was too short, as was the next drivetrain we tried: an LS1 with a Tremec TKO600 5-spd. That transmission length was even worse, and no matter how far back we moved the engine the shifter location was still way forward of the factory shift boot and opening in the center console. The TKO600's shifter was way inside where the dash would be. Neither would work.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_0736-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3230-S.jpg
These two secondary braces had to be removed, and after using our spot weld cutter on 6 spot welds each one fell right out

After removing one spot-welded transmission tunnel brace (see above) and unbolting a few items mounted to the firewall, we did some more drivetrain mock-ups and got the engine back as far as we could without serious tunnel surgery, something we always try to avoid in any swap we want a customer to be able to replicate in their home garage. We measured the shifter location on a ZF S6-40 6-spd transmission we also had on hand, and it wasn't anywhere close either. We finally called our transmission expert, Joe D, and he mentioned the Tremec Magnum XL 6-spd that featured a direct mounted shifter about 5.5" further back than the normal direct-shift T56.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2664-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3294-S.jpg
The second drivetrain we swapped in was another LSx V8 and a Tremec TKO600 5-spd

This transmission was developed for the S197 5.0 Mustang chassis as well as the 5th gen Camaro LS3, but never came from the factory installed in either car. Both of these cars come with factory transmissions that have remote mounted shifters, and in both cases the shift feel is terrible. We've installed T56 Magnum XL 6-speeds into late model Mustangs and the difference in shift feel is remarkable, not to mention the extra torque capacity these have (rated at 700 ft-lbs of torque!) compared to the stock Gretrag MT-82 in the 5.0 Mustang.

continued below

continued below

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7576-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7554-S.jpg
The long-awaited and custom ordered Tremec T56 Magnum XL arrived!

The problem was, Tremec hadn't yet made the production model of the transmission to work with the GM LS-series engines. Joe said he could custom build us one with an input shaft made to fit the flywheel depth and pilot hole diameter of the LSx, like he has done for Grand Am and World Challenge racers with 5th gen Camaros. So after many measurements and inspections on the FR-S engine bay and tunnel we took a gamble, ordered this custom Magnum XL transmission and waited for it to arrive. We also picked up an LS2 GTO 6.0L oil pan, which has a "front sump", hoping it would clear the FR-S crossmember. Based on previous swaps and where this FR-S crossmember was located, I felt this "front sump" oil pan would fit.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7595-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7568-S.jpg
The final LSx + T56 Magnum XL drivetrain placement was about as perfect as you can get

After many weeks of waiting the Magnum XL arrived and we got to work on the final series of drivetrain mock-ups. We also bought a new LS3 intake manifold kit, complete with fuel rail and drive-by-wire LS3 throttle body. We want to use the later model Corvette LS3 PCM (power control module), as it has a faster processor and advanced CAN-BUS options, to better match the FR-S systems. That means we would use the LS3 intake manifold, which has an electronically controlled throttle and not a direct cable controlled throttle. The cylinder heads for the LS3 are different than what we have on our mock-up block, but at this step it didn't matter.

After about 6 or 7 iterations and tweaks with the "LS3" + Magnum XL drivetrain in and out of the car we finally have the engine where we want it, as far back as the heater core and intake allow. We then tweaked the driveline angle (downward tilt of the engine) to match the factory diff angle. Then we started building the prototype set of motor mounts.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7623-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7711-S.jpg

That's where we are now, and today our crew removed the interior to help develop the transmission crossmember. After those bits are done we will develop a full length 1-3/4" primary stainless steel header with 3" collectors. Unlike what some other V8 swap kit makers like to do, we make real exhaust headers the hard way, because it makes SO much more power everywhere. The shortcut normally taken by others it so buy a cheap set of 1-1/2" "block hugger" shorty universal fit headers, heat them with a torch and smash any tube with a hammer that gets in the way.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects.../DSC5995-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...949-copy-S.jpg
The BMW E46 LSx prototype headers were developed and built in house, with final production by a major US header manufacturer

That short cut header is a huge restriction and can cost upwards of 50 hp, but making custom full length headers is so much work that most shops won't bother. We wouldn't have it any other way, and our production full length headers tend to add 40 hp over stock. Once the prototype headers are made here at Vorshlag we will ship them to our production header supplier, where they will make fixtures based on our prototype set. Then they will make a production run of stainless steel headers using a CNC bender, making our kit headers both more cost effective and improving fit repeatability.

continued below

continued from above

And yes, for you California folks we have tested many sets of OEM exhaust manifolds and found one that fits, so this swap could feasibly meet 50 state emissions and pass the CARB referees, but we won't likely do one of those for a while. Our installs will all have our headers, and if its a street car we will add proper catalysts as well.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Product-...65_YVgQU-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag..._DSC1715-S.jpg
Vorshlag production 1-3/4" x 3" full length stainless steel headers fit the E36 BMW chassis like a glove

Everything else will be built in-house, like our production E36 and E46 motor mounts are now. We use CNC laser cut flanges, bolt them into our production fixtures, then TIG-weld everything together. Each welded part is testing on another fixture, then they are powder coated for long term durability and good looks.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Service/.../0/S/JPG-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Product-..._DSF4192-S.jpg

After the drivetrain mounts and headers are built there are still a dozen of other parts and sub-systems to tackle, but its nothing we haven't done many times before: Cooling system hoses, reservoirs, radiator and fans; intake air tubing, filters, and MAF sensor; electrical wiring to the engine, gauges, OBD-II port and CAN-BUS integration; driveshaft, shifter and transmission crossmember fabrication; fuel pump, lines, hoses and regulator, from the tank to the engine; and last would be the relocation of various components that were in the way of the V8. There could be more than that, but so far that is a valid list.

What About the Weight???

The number one question we get on every build is "how much weight will the V8 add?" Don't worry... we know Newton's Second Law of Motion: F = ma. We're going to really up the "a" with the LS engine and keep the "m" as low as possible.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4075-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC8074-S.jpg

We here at Vorshlag are fanatics about weight, even when we are racing in our 3800 pound TT3 Mustang, heh. We weigh everything during a build like this, and we have already weighed lots of FT86 bits in the BRZ project build thread. You will see lots of pictures with various bits on one of our digital scales in this thread also. Why? Because the internet is full of poor data, numbers that turn out to be bogus, and people that are full of crap. We bring the tech, and when it comes to weights we show pictures of anything we reference on a proper scale.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...a-weight-L.jpg
Here's an example of a race-prepped BMW 3 series with LS1 V8 power at 2508 pounds. That's with a full road race legal roll cage, too!

Often times, as with our BMW LS1 swaps, the additional weight of the all-aluminum and compact LSx series of V8s is nil, and we only gain weight in the transmission (the T56 6-speed is a brute and weighs over 125 pounds). Our full street duty/full interior BMW swaps are usually within 20-40 pounds of the stock set-up. The iron block inline-6 engines used in E36 3 series BMWs is HEAVY and long, and the LS1 engine is a hair lighter and about 12 inches shorter, which moves the drivetrain mass rearward for better front:rear weight bias. We feel that the FR-S LSx is going to be much along the same lines, with more rearward weight bias and a gain of 40-50 pounds, at most. This isn't some wild guess, but based on dozens of previous swaps, and weights we've taken of these engines before.

Remember the 480 pound measurement of the factory FA20 and 5-spd, shown above? Well a Tremec T56 Magnum XL is 128 pounds and a factory LS6 weighs 457 pounds, with a lighter than stock flywheel (which we always do - it doesn't need a 48 pound 2-piece factory flywheel, even for street use) plus the heavy OEM exhaust manifolds and a power steering pump. This 86 chassis has electric assist power steering built in the steering column, so we will remove the hydraulic power steering pump from the LSx engine we end up with, and our exhaust headers always save weight over OEM cast iron manifolds. After we do the math it looks like it is going to be pretty close to the stock weight, which is good. The weight of a turbocharger and intercooler from our before weight here is not insignificant, either. If we're wrong on that guess, we'll show it here, too. Look for the final weight of the FR-S once this V8 swap is done, which we will compare with the "before" weight.

What's Next?

That's enough for now. Tune in next time when we have the motor mounts completed and start to tackle the next bits like the driveshaft, headers, fuel system changes, and wiring. And yes, we have an OBD2 expert already on the case to make the GM computer talk to the factory FT86 computer, and our build here will have functional gauges and electric power steering.

Please note: ANY NEWS about the swap kit, swap parts availability and pricing will be posted here AS SOON AS WE HAVE IT. Please don't call our over-taxed employees at Vorshlag or the folks at Texas Track Works to ask "when will the kits be released??" - we will post any news here first. :)

Thanks!

Project Updates for June 9, 2014: It has been a hectic couple of months at Vorshlag since my last update. We were buried in early 2014 season preparations and parts sales for many of our customers as well as prepping and racing one of our cars (2011 Mustang in NASA TT3). We also have to pace our V8 swap kit development projects like this one (where Vorshlag writes off about 75% of the hours towards kit development) with paying customer service and race prep work - that pays the bills. I got a little busy myself as well, but after a nasty 150 mph crash I had at Road Atlanta a month ago, that side-lined me from racing for a bit, I'm getting caught up on a lot of project build posts like this one (and this, and that, and even this). During these past two months our shop has made some good headway on this FR-S V8 swap and the NB Miata LS1 Alpha project, which I'm writing an update for next. Let's go ahead and dive into where we are now on the FT86 V8 swap...

Drivetrain Mounting in Kit Form is Tricky

As I've said before, making a one-off V8 swap is relatively easy. Bring us a car, choose the drivetrain, and we can get it in there in a couple of months for a race car (we did just that for a customer in January-February, as well as full race prep, custom brakes, custom cage, all safety gear, and a full re-wire and re-plumb from front to back). One-off V8 swaps go much faster because you can cut things out of the way and just fabricate the best solution in the tie allotted. Making the custom motor and transmission mounts even for a one-off V8 swap is still relatively easy - its takes about a day and a half on something like this FR-S, once you have the drivetrain in the right spot.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/photos/i...-W4Xt96x-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/photos/i...-xw7dLJx-S.jpg
Left: Big ugly hole in firewall patched with aluminum, held in place temporarily by Clecos. Right: A big hole was filled with shiny new steel

We could just stuff the drivetrain in there wherever we wanted; cut away the firewall or tunnel or whatever is in the way; measure everything to get the driveline angles perfected, leveled and centered; then cut a hole for the shifter. After that was done we would go back and plate over the holes with aluminum or even patch in sheet steel to make it look OEM, like we did on the firewall for this one-off Ford Coyote 5.0L V8 swap above last week. This was a one-off V8 swap that was brought to us to complete. To fill some holes in the firewall we used two methods: aluminum panels in the left picture and seamlessly integrated welded steel panels on the right, as shown above.

Making these custom panels to cover up holes or other sins is common on a race car, and they can be done on a street car and look seamless and factory, but not easily in kit form. The pictures below were on a car that never had this particular transmission installed by the factory, and it didn't fit the trans tunnel. So part of the tunnel was cut away then a new cover was custom fabricated out of aluminum and bolted in place.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/photos/i...-fX76Vhr-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/photos/i...-GFrmj97-S.jpg

With the finished transmission cover panel bolted in place (with captured "rivnuts" so you don't have to hold a nut on the back side) and later covered in thermal insulating material, it was no longer an unsafe gaping hole in the floorpan. This particular aluminum panel structure can be unbolted to access the tailshaft, add fluid to the shifter opening or replace/re-grease shifter mechanism. It also makes drivetrain removal even easier when removed, yet it is still heat and fireproof. On a street car this could all be under carpet and fully functional.

But for an engine swap that we want others to be able to replicate in their garage using our parts, this type of significant tunnel or firewall surgery and custom fitted panels is not an option. You don't want to have to try to copy where we cut out this piece of sheet metal then make patches to fit, no no no. Yet there are some popular LS1 swaps out there that do expect you to strip your street car down to the bare tub, cut out the transmission tunnel or firewall and just "make it clear the engine where our mounts put it". Significant welding and custom fabrication work is not what we'd call a "do it yourself swap kit"

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag...2%20copy-L.jpg

Our BMW swap kits are made to bolt-in without any welding or fabrication needed, and that's how we're designing or FT86 LSx swap kit - as much as possible. To make a swap kit that is easily repeatable takes a LOT more work involved in the initial design. Our choices of drivetrain parts and locations are narrowed considerably when you cannot cut the tunnel or firewall out and replace pieces or entire sections with new bits. You have seen how many transmissions we've tested on this swap (4). We could have made any of them fit with enough custom fabrication work on the tunnel and firewall, but that's not a "production swap kit", that's a "one-off swap". And we are making a production kit here...

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag..._DSC7744-L.jpg

The remote coolant reservoir above, which we make for our BMW E36 chassis LS1 swap, bolts into 3 factory threaded holes in the chassis. It has an integrated mount for the factory heater control valve, relocated from across the engine bay. It houses the factory BMW level sensor on the bottom side, which fits in a channel that happened to be there. The heater hoses clear the routing for our A/C lines. Making new parts fit with all of these constraints takes lots of extra time to plan for and build around. We have to make all of our swap kit components key off of and/or bolt into factory holes. This ensures everyone can locate the drivetrain or other bits we are changing in the same exact spots as we designed. We also go to great lengths to prevent the need for a welder, or cutting off of huge chunks of the chassis, firewall and transmission tunnel.

This extra work required to make everything function as factory looking swap, with proper engineering principles, takes tons of extra time. Time we get to pay for, not the Alpha customers that work with us. They just have to be patient while we go to these extra lengths, on our dime, but our Alpha swap customers have all been great.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...3_194725-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...4_100307-S.jpg

The way we make the mounts also has to take into account production manufacturing techniques, like computer CNC Laser Cut portions of sheet or plate steel or aluminum. We even add things like holes, slots and tabs to key or bolt together during fabrication, using our custom production fixtures, to have make each motor mount or transmission crossmember to be as accurate to the original. And fit the chassis as well as as possible. Making a one-off set of mounts would be SO much easier.

FR-S LSx Drivetrain Mounts Version 2.0

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7715-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7716-S.jpg
The more we looked at the hood clearance, the less we liked the old LS3 intake and throttle body location. It was time for Ver 2.0

We have already made one set of motor mounts for this swap, but after closer examination, I had the guys chunk them in the recycle bin and start over. We had left an extra 1/2 inch that we could move the engine rearward after removing one additional, bolted-on factory part off the firewall. That meant 20+ hours of measuring, mock-up, re-measuring, tweaking and fabrication were thrown away. Moving the engine back as far as possible without cutting the firewall is THAT important, especially when we could make a lot of these FR-S swap kits (we've officially surpassed 100 kits for the LS1 BMW E36 chassis now).

continued below

continued below

Our crew here was cool with it, just more development hours. Once the engine was moved back to the final, optimum location Olof and Brad noticed one or two factory bits that were really in the way of a better mounting solution. Our new head fabricator Ryan H expressed his concerns over a couple of stamped sheet metal bits that he thought should be removed, so we had a meeting and after a few spot welds were cut, the remaining tunnel structure was much more favorable to the mounts we wanted to build.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3230-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7568-S.jpg

As you can see in two pictures I originally posted in my first update, shown again above, the Tremec Magnum XL was getting awfully close to one of the transmission tunnel support brackets. This is a U-shaped stamped sheet metal structure spot welded into the sheet metal tunnel that the OEM transmission mounting bracket supports were then spot welded to (see my original post describing the removal of those). After we moved the drivetrain back that crucial 1/2 inch this U-shaped piece interfered with the Magnum XL. Instead of having our customers just "clearance here" on this structure we decided to simply remove them. And in any case, after we had removed the two little brackets (post #1) this big U-shaped support was no longer needed (it was simply a place to mount other brackets to).

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2998-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC2991-S.jpg
With the U-shaped structure finally removed (about two dozen spot welds) the transmission tunnel had lots of room

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2846-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2848-S.jpg
Our 2nd set of motor mounts and new drivetrain location required removing these 3 spot welded brackets

Above you can see the U-shaped brace that was removed, as it no longer served any purpose and was just in the way. At right are two little funky, angled, bent steel pieces were barely attached to the steel front subframe welded assembly and after a couple of spot welds they were gone.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC7626-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2841-S.jpg
Left: Our first set of mounts had weird bends. Right: After removing two stamped steel bits our motor mounts will fit a LOT better

Removing these slotted black brackets removed a big angled protrusion from both spots on the subframe where we wanted to land our mounts. The first mounts we built had weird bends to try to go around the factory bits (above left), but now with a nice square section of crossmember to mount to (above right) the new lower portion of the motor mounts will sit flush against this vertical wall of steel - and still bolt into factory drilled holes. This makes our new LSx motor mounts (version 2.0) a little easier to make, but it will now have an additional hole to secure them to the subframe and sit more securely there. Removing these 2 brackets was super easy - 2 spot welds per side and they popped right off.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2850-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3066-S.jpg

continued below

continued below

Here is the U-shaped transmission tunnel structure that was interfering with the big Tremec Magnum XL 6-speed manual, so after some spot welds were cut it was removed. There were a decent number of spot welds, but it came off in about 30 minutes. See my quick write-up for Spot Weld Removal tips below - its fairly easy and takes no special skills, just a $5 spot weld cutter and a drill.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...3_194732-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Product-...1%20copy-S.jpg

Olof made the new Tremec Maxnum XL specific crossmember fabrication (above) that squeezed into the tunnel nicely. Two side plates will bolt to and key off of the chassis, then have 4 holes per side that are drilled into the transmission tunnel (see them bolted in place, two rows above). Then our new U-shaped transmission crossmember will bolt to those side plates, which have some bolt-together attachment points integrated into them. One of our Vorshlag bolt-through 95A polyurethane T56 mounting bushings will go between the transmission crossmember and the Tremec 6-speed.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3092-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3101-S.jpg

These brackets and mounts have since been finished welded, templates were made and reverse engineered from each piece, and CAD drawings produced for laser cut production runs of these mounts and crossmembers. I'm happy where the drivetrain ended up, as this gained us more room at the throttle body/hood and moved the weight back even more towards the rear.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2843-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2844-S.jpg

Here are the semi-finished prototype motor mounts and transmission crossmember pieces that we will use for the LSx V8 and Tremec Magnum XL. Unlike some shops that never show off their swap parts, we're showing the unfinished prototypes. I'm sure some of you arm chair engineers will want to comment, but remember: 1) these are prototype parts and 2) we have made 100+ V8 swap kits over the past 8 years and have had zero failures. We still have a few more gussets to add to the transmission crossmember mounting pad, then these welded parts will be painted, assembled with the correct poly bushings and hardware, and installed back in the car next week. They are light and strong, and we will road/track test them before going into production for anything.

Cutting Spot Welds Is Easy

This V8 swap kit installation is going to require a little bit more work than some of our swaps we developed in the past, but it is nothing insurmountable by any able bodied person with a drill. There are 5 factory stamped sheet metal pieces we have removed - three from the tunnel and two from the factory engine crossmember. These are attached with simple spot welds. It is unfortunate that we need these removed for the kit to work well, but it is worth it for a better engine placement.

In this section I will show the process for removing two pieces of sheet metal parts that are spot welded together. I did an entire roof panel removal in my home garage, which had hundreds of spot welds, and it took less than half a day. These 5 pieces on the FR-S will take even less work.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0121-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0355-S.jpg
This "roof swap" wasn't much fun, but all of the hard work was in the welding. Removal of the old skin was easy

Several years ago I owned a BMW 330 Coupe that had a sunroof and full interior, which I raced in an SCCA class (DSP) that didn't allow for gutting the interior or adding a sunroof delete panel (there are carbon fiber panels you can bolt or bond in place of the sunroof cassette). I couldn't sit in the car upright without my head in the roof panel, so I converted the BMW to the factory non-sunroof structure for more headroom. This conversion included a new roof skin, an addition of one more roof bow, and a new headliner. We started by removing the entire roof skin that was both bonded and spot welded to the surrounding structure in about 200 places around the perimeter. Some of these spot welds were hard to get to, as we had to remove the front and rear glass and all of the interior to even see them. But once we had access, we had the roof skin off in a couple of hours using a drill, a spot weld cutter and some elbow grease.

continued below

continued from above

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0094-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0097-S.jpg
Left: Typical spot weld cutting tool (small hole saw with a spring loaded centering pin). Right: Spring loaded center punch marks the spot

A spot weld cutter is essential a tiny hole saw with a spring-loaded alignment pin. The goal is make a small dimple in the middle of the spot weld, align the pin in this dimple, then use the tool to cut around the spot weld. This releases the top layer of steel from the base layer. If you do it correctly only the outer layer has a (1/4" diameter) hole in it - and this is the layer we want to discard - while the base layer ends up with the little "bump" of extra weld material left. This bump is the weld and steel from the outer metal layer, which can be ground smooth or in this case, ignored.

On the FR-S, we're just removing some things that are no longer needed to make room for the new transmission or engine mounts. Luckily we don't have to weld anything in place of these removed parts, or even grind the remaining bumps smooth (that's optional - and we did that for better aesthetics). These stamped steel parts are spot welded together without any bonding agent and come off with relative ease. Sure, the joints have a bit of seam sealer smeared over the edges, to prevent water from getting underneath them, but with a little coercion they still come right off once ALL of the spot welds are gone. The spot welds are easy to see - each one leaves a small round blemish in the outer layer of steel.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0102-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0100-S.jpg
The spot weld cutter is simply a tiny hole saw with a guide pin that aligns with the punched dimple you add in the center of the spot weld

The FR-spot welds we were after are all easy to see and easy to access, with the drivetrain out. Only the outer layer of sheet steel needs to be cut with the spot weld cutter - the inner transmission tunnel metal should be left alone. Once the spot welds are gone from the outer section these stamped parts can be pulled off with your hands, but if you get a stubborn spot weld (or don't drill it from the center) a chisel or screw driver can be used to pry the metal apart.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0108-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Instruct...DSC_0112-S.jpg
On this car there was a bonding agent in addition to the spot welds, so they had to be pried apart. On the FR-S the panels were only spot welded

Rest assured, this step is not too difficult and you won't be welding things back onto the car once these bits are removed. Just be prepared to spend a few hours with a $5 spot weld cutter and a drill before our production motor mounts and transmission crossmember will have enough room to bolt into place. We will show more of this step after the kit is in production, with some videos.

What's Next?

Right now the FR-S is sitting with the drivetrain temporarily held in place (below) by an engine hanger while the prototype motor mounts and trans crossmember are being welded, painted and assembled. Then we can get the final engine in place and gather the parts needed for the engine accessories (Corvette LS2 or something compact like these). After the engine is fully assembled and the radiator is back in place we can finally begin prototype header construction, a custom 1-piece aluminum driveshaft can be measured and built, and a cold air inlet tube can be design and routed.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2839-L.jpg

In our next installment I'll show these steps listed above and detail the final motor being used for this car. It will likely be an LS1 5.7L with an LS2 intake manifold in this Alpha car, but since many folks doing this swap will opt for the "easy button" 430 hp 6.2L LS3 crate motor from GM (about $6500, with a warranty) and the includes LS3 intake manifold, we will make sure both LS2 and LS3 variants fit. While there are no external differences in any of the LSx V8 family of blocks/heads, these two intake manifolds (LS2 vs LS3) have small changes that we need to design around. The LS1/LS6 intake manifold are very different (and have a mechanical throttle body, which we don't want; this car has an electronic throttle pedal) and push the throttle body way too far forward, but we'll test and show that in the next build thread update.

More soon!

Project Updates for Dec 17th, 2014: A lot has happened with this project - and at Vorshlag - since my last post in this thread. There should have been about 2 or 3 updates since then, but I'm horribly behind on updating project threads, so you guys get a BIG one today. Vorshlag has been busy with new shop construction, a move to a new space twice as large, adding fabrication equipment and CNC machines, going to SEMA/OUSCI, etc. Our service shop has been cranking out race car builds, custom suspension/chassis/aero/safety upgrades for various track cars as well as production work. I talk a little more about the shop move and SEMA in this recent Alpha Miata LS1 update (link).

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G8388-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4856-S.jpg

We are really pushing to complete this FR-S V8 project. Luckily we already have lot of initial parts development completed with this car Alpha build, and we should be able to produce our typical "Stage 0" kit sometime early in 2015. Stage 0 is usually - motor mounts, transmission crossmember, oil pan, headers, and driveshaft. We will also have the front drive accessories, most of the cooling system parts, and maybe a few other items completed and ready to go to production by Spring. We will then fine tune production solutions for "everything else" on the next "Beta" build - wiring, gauge integration, fuel system, etc.

Drivetrain Mounting Solution

Last time we checked in on this Alpha build we were wrapping up the transmission crossmember and attacking the motor mounts. We really made two sets of mounts, but somebody didn't follow my instructions and the first set was tossed straight into the trash. A second set was made properly and this pair + all of the pieces to the transmission crossmember were removed, finished welded, cleaned up and powder coated gloss black in early August.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC6865-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Product-...6%20copy-S.jpg

The transmission crossmember assembly is shown above, with the motor mounts next to these parts and all of the hardware needed shown. There are also two reinforcement plates on the inside of the tunnel that we will add, similar to what we did on the Alpha Miata V8. The final powder coated parts were installed onto the car after they were photographed in our little in-house photo studio.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3408-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Product-...8%20copy-S.jpg

The motor mounts have the proven polyurethane bushing used in 100+ LS1 swaps built by Vorshlag since there was no reason to reinvent the wheel. The transmission mount busing is also something we've used many times, and we make this in both 95A durometer polyurethane or in a harder Nylon material for pure race cars. These design features have been used on both street and race applications and the polyurethane bushings damp engine vibrations well while keeping drivetrain movement to a minimum. The Vorshlag motor mounts (shown below) bolt into existing holes in the crossmember and have massive exhaust header room.


http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3409-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3410-S.jpg

These are near-production ready versions, with the major aspects and mounting points positioned right where we want them. This means the drivetrain is now set in the car where we designed it to be - after many iterations, measurements, and discussions - so the shifter location, drive line angles, fore-aft placement, left-right and up-down positioning are all locked down. We have scanned these final prototype bits and from that data we have made CAD designs with about 3 revisions in SolidWorks. The production versions of these parts will be made from CNC laser cut plate pieces that will be altered ever so slightly for repeatable volume production. We will make production welding fixtures during the Beta build.

With the drivetrain locations set we could move to the next big phase of this swap - construction of the exhaust headers.

Long Tube Header Development

This is a huge step, and usually the biggest challenge for home-built engine swaps, but it is something we have done many times. The prototype FR-S swap headers were completed a couple of months ago. Let's go back look at the process so than I can explain how we go about making one-off and production exhaust headers in a cost effective way, with zero compromises to the fit, performance or quality.

We have a certain set of rather expensive header development tools we use on these engine swaps that allows us to make multiple primary tube routings very quickly, which cuts down on development time and leads to a better final layout. The prototype process still took over 50 hours for this first pair of headers, even with an experienced fabricator and all of the trick tools.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3894-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3902-S.jpg

continued below

continued from above

First we acquired 304 Stainless Steel exhaust port flanges and 3" merge collectors, then a big box of stainless mandrel bends in 1.75" diameter. We used our production header supplier to source these parts, so they would match the production CNC bender's sizing for this sized primary tube. The flanges were bolted to the cylinder heads and the collectors were placed where they were appropriate. These were locked down in place with temporary brackets tack welded to the collectors and bolted to the chassis, with proper ground clearance as well as the best primary tube length distances.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3927-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3955-S.jpg

Next, four primary tubes at a time were laid out up in the plastic mock-up tooling and many iterations of these tubes were tested until the best routing and packaging were made with the least number and severity of bends. This takes many hours and a lot of clicking and unclicking of these orange plastic bits - but its kind of fun seeing it all come together. Eventually the most logical routing is decided on and that process is complete.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_3952-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4007-S.jpg

The hardest side to do is always the driver's - to route around the steering shaft, which always seems to be right in the way. As the final four tubes are completed in plastic, each one is turned into stainless steel tubes and mandrel bends, tack welded (or taped) together, perfectly matching the plastic mock-up tubes in length, diameter, bend radius, and angle of cut.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4013-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2456-S.jpg

While it looks like we work from the top down, its really the collector that dictates a lot of the constraints, and that's where the focus usually lies - and around the steering shaft. The wide engine bay of the FT86 gives us liberal room to make nice, straight runs out of the exhaust port before turning, which we almost never get to do on most swaps. This should mean we will see at least the typical power gains over LSx exhaust manifolds that we usually get with our V8 swap headers.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2782-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2467-S.jpg

The passenger side went much more quickly since nothing was in the way. We did round up an air conditioning compressor and bracket first, to make sure the primary tube routing up front was clear, but that proved to not be much of an issue with the final accessory drive set-up we chose (see more below). We also had sourced a new LSx starter and mounted it to the mock-up engine, as the passenger side set of tubes needed to route around that with as much room as possible - to avoid heat soaking the attached starter solenoid.

continued below

Wow sorry but I lost interest early on in the read. Anyone know when cliff notes will be available?? ;-)

http://www.trephination.net/gallery/...liff_notes.jpg

continued from above



http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2657-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2654-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2672-S.jpg

Once routing aspects were perfected, each tube was tack welded at each junction, then removed and fully seam welded at each joint. These 8 completed prototype primary tubes were then tack welded to the exhaust flanges and merge collectors. Again, this entire process took over a week of solid work (53.5 hours, to be exact). Some of the extra time comes from trying to make these reproducible - knowing the distance between bends that the CNC bender's clamps can make - but even one-off headers usually take 40-50 hours to make for a V8.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2671-M.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2666-M.jpg

The final layout we ended up with follows the contours of the chassis, which dictates a lot of the shape of the final product, but it also uses good fabrication, the best materials, and proper header design to maximize power gains. Our previous LS1 swap headers have proven to pick up 40-50 wheel horsepower over stock manifolds or worse, the block hugger shorty header designs some folks use on these swaps - because making one off custom headers that flow well is so difficult.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2802-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2813-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2814-S.jpg

Although we could have sent the headers off with the tubes just tack welded together at the many junctions, Olof seam welded each tube. Why? To be able to get this car back on the road quicker than normal for a typical Alpha swap development timeframe of 12-18 months. Once these prototype tubes return we will finish weld them and get this set ready to go into this car. The customer met with us today and wants his set ceramic coated, so we'll have that process added to his set as well.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...dow_1600-L.jpg

Our crew carefully packaged and shipped the final prototype FRS LSx headers (above) to our US header manufacturer, who then made a production fixture from that set, then blew apart each assembly into individual tubes. They then measured and modeled each tube and replicated all eight in CNC bent tubes, then they put together a pre-production header assembly and sent it to us for testing. The passenger side fit perfectly on the first try but we just received and tested the 2nd production iteration for the driver's side and it is almost perfect. We just have a few small interferences to work out around the steering shaft.

continued below

continued from above

Real Engine Install + Clutch/PP/Flywheel

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._DSC3046-L.jpg
Check out how wide the OEM 2.0L engine above looks in the engine bay compared to the 5.7L V8 shown below

While the headers were being manufactured and test sets sent to us for trial fitting (a 2-3 month process) we used that time to tackle other aspects of this swap.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4718-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4723-S.jpg
Mock-up motor was removed and the rebuilt 5.7L aluminum LS1 was put in place

First we wanted to get the final LS1 engine into this car. The final engine choice was chosen by the customer from several choices we offered, from 5.3L aluminum longblocks to 6.2L LS3 crate engine, and included a rebuilt 5.7L LS1 engine from HK Racing Engines that we had on hand for another project. They chose the all aluminum 5.7L, so out came the mock-up motor (which was spending time jumping between the FRS and Miata) and in went the rebuilt 5.7L V8. This 5.7L is all aluminum and should make for great acceleration levels in this 2650-ish pound package.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag...97m57LS1-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Vorshlag...DSC_4915-S.jpg

We just put an identical 5.7L LS1 set-up with our swap headers and full exhaust/catalysts into a customer's turn-key BMW (see above) and it made 344 whp / 364 wtq on pump gas. This is a stone stock 5.7 LS1 engine, built to last 100K miles under a factory warranty, and is not stressed in this 3000 pound BMW. Drives like a beast, but idles at 600 rpm and is quiet as a mouse. We built that car with a double muffler set-up to keep it super quiet, too. An LS3 engine tends to make an extra 50-60 whp over that even in stock form, and there are dozens of tricks to pump up the power beyond stock levels in any LSx. The 340+ whp number this motor will likely achieve in the FR-S is slightly more than the customer wanted, but its hard to make less than that without going to a smaller 4.8L or 5.3L engine.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...flywheel-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4689-S.jpg

After consulting with our supplier, then talking with Texas Track Works and the end customer, we sourced an aluminum flywheel and clutch kit for this car. The flywheel is a Fidanza aluminum 1-piece design, which is substantially lighter than the stock dual-mass steel unit at only 12 pounds. I have used these in countless LSx powered vehicles, both street and race cars, and there are no adverse side effects to performance - just the potential for a little more NVH transferred to the cabin. The OEM dual mass flywheels are HEAVY but they do damp a little transmission noise. Its worth nearly 30 pounds and it makes the motor much more responsive, so for most folks this upgrade is a no-brainer. On a track use car it is pretty much a requirement.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G6596-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G6732-S.jpg

A new pilot bearing was installed in the end of the crank then the flywheel was installed to the crank flange with new ARP bolts. The chosen Stage 1 SPEC clutch and pressure plate were aligned to the crank and installed and torque with ARP bolts as well. This should easily handle the torque of this engine while giving a light clutch effort. All of the bolts torqued were paint marked to remind us that they are done, of course.

continued below

continued from above

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G6589-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_5339-S.jpg

A variation of our popular and proven Vorshlag T56 Hyd. ThrowOutBearing Kit with remote bleeder was built to fit the FR-S and installed behind the pressure plate and onto the input shaft of the Tremec T56 Magnum XL, first (see below, left). This kit is based around a new hydraulic TOB but the stock hydraulic line bits are replaced with new stainless braided hydraulic lines and new quick-connects made by one of our suppliers to our specs. The OEM quick-connect is a non-standard size, so getting the mating piece for the chassis side isn't possible without buying an OEM piece from GM and scavenging the connector. We also added a remote bleeder hose and bleeder for this car, to make bleeding the clutch hydraulics a breeze within the tight confines of the FR-S tunnel. We have built many of these kits for our BMW swaps, so that was easy for us to create here.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G6586-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4725-S.jpg

We also took a picture while the transmission was out of the slight tweak that has to happen to the T56 Magnum XL to fit the tunnel without using a hammer. There are two small aluminum "prongs" that need to be ground down (shown above right). There is an excess protrusion on both of these that is made to protect the nearby sensor , but trimming these down flush still keeps the sensor safe from getting banged up during installation and makes room for the FR-S tunnel. The picture above at right shows the lower two of these four protrusions, and the only ones close are the top pair. Just trim those down level with the sensor and you won't have to dimple the transmission tunnel.

Oil Pan + Baffle Kit

The final piece of the drivetrain tackled in this step was the oil pan and associated bits. The GTO (front sump) oil pan we are using for this swap is different than almost all other LSx (rear sump) oil pans, both from the factory or the aftermarket. I showed this before, but not with any real details.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_5340-L.jpg

The unusual placement of the front crossmember and "rear steer" placement of the steering rack on the FT86 chassis requires the use of this front sump pan, which is obvious when you see the image above. A more typical rear sump LSx oil pan would never work here. Initially we had notched two little webs at the back of the pan for clearance. After the 1st set of motor mounts were rejected, I had our guys push the engine back another full inch and make the new mounts, to perfect the shifter location as well as try to improve the front to rear weight balance. Now an unmodified GTO oil pan will fit this swap with our production mounts.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_5338-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4724-S.jpg

We are occasionally asked if our swap parts will work with parts from other companies, or homemade parts. For the most part, the answer is "no". The parts we make are all made to work together, and the tolerances for the whole drivetrain and header package can be pretty tight. The headers fit only if the drivetrain is in the exact placement we use, which our motor mounts and transmission crossmember locate. Most shops that buy our kits buy everything we make, even when they know they could replicate some of the pieces on their own. Why? Because they know that time is money, and the hundreds of hours of development time we invest during these new swaps saves them from having to churn through the same hours to make the same things. Just something to consider - we will sell the various swap pieces individually, of course.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E...DSC_7493-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Racing-E...DSC_7496-S.jpg
We learned that an oil pan "trap door" style drop-in baffle kit is a good idea on this LS1 V8 BMW

Since I've seen first hand that high cornering loads can lead to oil starvation, I always recommend an Improved Racing oil pan baffle kit for any LSx engine that will see autocross, road course, or aggressive "corner carving" use.

continued below

continued from above



http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Product-...baffle02-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Product-...-baffled-S.jpg

We've had excellent results with these on high horsepower road course builds, and it didn't take much convincing with the Texas Track Works crew to sign off on this upgrade. The GTO oil pan version was installed into the pan we had already acquired and that was the last piece that went onto the rebuilt 5.7L motor before it went in the car.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4717-L.jpg

Using the proper bellhousing to engine bolts, the drivetrain was finally fully assembled for the last time. Olof and Ryan slid it back into the car and bolted it up to the motor mounts and transmission crossmember. That was one of the last steps completed at our old shop - the car was trailered to our new shop in October and we got back to work a few weeks later (moving sucks).

Front Drive Accessories

Once the LS1 was in the car it was time to dress the front of the motor with the engine driven accessories. When you buy a used engine it rarely comes with the accessories and brackets, and even on the rare occasions it does they are almost never the right parts for your application. Most of the new LSx "crate motors" come without the front drive bits as well - so sourcing new brackets and accessories like the alternator and water pump for a V8 swap is common. The costs can really sneak up on you, too.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...692_edit-L.jpg

Between the various GEN III and GEN IV LS-series engines (displacements from 4.8L to 7.0, with both iron and aluminum blocks) there are dozens of different front accessory drive layouts. Some are wide, some are tall, some poke out in front of the engine, and some are compact. Luckily we've worked with virtually all of the cars and trucks that ever came with an LSx V8 and we know what works best in different swaps.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_2115-L.jpg
1998-02 "4th gen F-body" (Camaro/Firebird) LS1 engine accessory drive layout is compact and narrow

Traditionally we have used the 1998-2002 Camaro/Firebird LS1 engine accessory drive layout (see above), but some of the brackets are getting harder to source new or used (GM has stopped making one of the brackets) and the pulleys are longer front to back than would fit in this FR-S (about an inch longer than what we chose). They work great in just about any BMW, which comes with a long inline six engine and deep engine bays, but not so on the FR-S. For the longest time this was the only choice for a lot of swaps that had narrow engine bays, but in the past decade many other LS engine accessory variations have popped up, and the FT86's short engine bay pushed us in another direction.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G8369-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4729-S.jpg

Choosing the right accessories may seem trivial but actually ate up of dozens of hours in research, parts ordering, testing different configurations, chasing down the bolt/stud/nut hardware, machining custom parts and even finding the right length belts. Since we found the right set-up - and its a bit unusual - we will make a "kit" for the FR-S/BRZ LSx swap that includes the alternator, balancer, and water pump, plus all of the necessary brackets, bolts, studs, nuts, pulleys, tensioners, spacers, and other parts needed.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4219-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4224-S.jpg

An optional second kit will have all of the parts needed to mount an air conditioning compressor - the compressor, bracket, belts, idlers and bolts. The A/C runs on a separate belt on LS-series engines, so that can be added later without affecting the main serpentine belt routing. We chose a short front-to-back OEM set of LS-engine brackets and accessories for this build because the engine bay was tight in that dimension - this car was was only made to house the small (front-to-back) boxer 4 engine that is only 2 cylinders deep. The width in this engine bay, however, is immense so there was no problem there. The height to the hood is tight, so that was a consideration in our decision as well.

continued below

continued from above

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2886-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2914-S.jpg

The tricky bit was making an arrangement that could work without a power steering pump, since the FR-S has electric power assist steering (EPAS) built into the factory steering column (other EPAS systems are electric assisted down in the rack and pinion). We have that "no power steering pump" option straightened out with some extra pulleys, some custom machined bits, and a new belt routing that should work great (after half a dozen belts were tested). We've seen this done elsewhere but it took a bit of legwork to track it all down and make the parts needed for this car. We picked up an SFI balancer form our engine builder along with a massive ARP 12-point crank bolt, which is reusable (unlike the OEM LS engine "torque to yield" bolt, which is a one-use bolt). There is no keyway on the crank, and this is a "neutral end balance" crank and balancer, so you can put the balancer on oriented however you like (there's not even a need for a timing light reference mark - that's all done automatically in the computer). The keyway is cut into the balancer anyway, in case you have a belt driven supercharger where you would add the slot and a pin or key to the crank so keep it locked to the balancer. Not needed in this case.

Cooling Solution

While we could have just left the stock radiaor in place, we knew that was a bad idea so we sourced a Mishimoto radiator early in this project. We had already test fit the Mishimoto radiator in place earlier, but now that needed it to be bolted down so some radiator hoses could to be built. We also needed to alter some other factory cooling systems parts to gain clearance for this big V8 up front.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_4727-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...9_201127-S.jpg

The change in power level from the stock 2.0L engine to this 5.7L engine would be substantial, and unlike on some of the the BMW LS1 swaps we have used, I doubt the Toyota/Subaru engineers added a LOT of extra cooling capacity to the stock radiator. It was also a plastic/aluminum assembly, which, in our experience, fails quickly with track use.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G8378-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2924-S.jpg

We use Mishimoto radiators on a lot of OEM powered and V8 swap builds for street and track use, including our TT3 prepped 2011 Mustang. They are 100% TIG welded, all aluminum radiators (avoiding the cheaper, failure prone, OEM style bonded plastic tank ends) with usually at least double the stock fluid capacity (with thicker cores). This means it can help the big V8 engine run cooler, which is always a safe choice for track use here in Texas. We can see 100°F or more in the Summer, and Texas racers want to run on our many road courses year round, so we have to make our cooling systems capable of this heat. Additionally this car's owner wanted air conditioning to get him to and from the track, so we have to make provisions for a the factory A/C condenser - which luckily bolts right to the front of the Mishimoto radiator using the same OEM hardware (above right).

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects..._4728-XL-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_5329-S.jpg

The Mishimoto looked like it had all sorts of room until you consider where the balancer would end up. The factory double fans also work in a "puller" configuration, so they sit behind the radiator (whereas a pusher style sits in front). And the two factory fans, mounted in a plastic shroud, were VERY DEEP (about 5"). Running right between the two side-by-side fans was a stamped steel brace that bowed inboard and bolted between the upper and lower radiator support structures (shown sitting on top of the motor in the above right pic). No way would the fans or this stamped piece fit with the V8.

continued below

continued from above



http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G8698-L.jpg

So we came up with a "compact" fan solution using "slim line" electric fans. They will move PLENTY of air but we wanted a nice shroud to mount them to, to ensure that the fans draw through the entire surface of the radiator. Olof built the aluminum fan shroud above to fit to this radiator with the 12" Mishimoto fans.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G8682-S.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G8677-S.jpg

A piece of aluminum plate was measured, marked, sheered, cut, bent, drilled and welded to make a shroud that stood about 1/2" off the back face of the radiator - with a foam rubber gasket isolating this metal structure from the aluminum radiator. The tabs we added are bolted to the OEM radiator mounting holes for the factory shroud, and the end result was pretty much perfect - and about 3" inches shorter, front to back. This set-up now allows room for the front engine balancer.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...DSC_5330-M.jpg http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2922-M.jpg

The stamped steel brace was removed but our guys will fabricate another bolt-on brace that doesn't "bow" into the way of the pulley - there's plenty of room, it just needs to be a different shape. The upper radiator support is VERY weak without this top-to-bottom support installed, and it needs to be strong because the hood latch mounts up there. As you can see in the above picture the full front accessory drive layout is complete, with the balancer and serpentine belt in place, and there's room to spare. I've also shown one of the two main radiator hoses mocked-up using Mishimoto silicone bends and some aluminum tube - we've used this arrangement many times.

These two 12" Mishimoto electric fans pull 1150 CFM each and will be controlled by the GM engine computer, based off of the GM temperature sensor that is placed in a cylinder head.

What's Next?

We've been getting a lot done to our two current Alpha swaps, the Miata and FR-S, and some solutions figured out on one car have helped us on the other. We are trying to keep both of these going in between "day work" and other non-development builds.

http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Projects...B61G2929-L.jpg

The FR-S needs a driveshaft, after-header exhaust, some plumbing and wiring, then the CAN-BUS programming. Its getting there...

Until next time!

Cheers,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POS Racing

Wow sorry but I lost interest early on in the read. Anyone know when cliff notes will be available?? ;-)

http://www.trephination.net/gallery/...liff_notes.jpg

---

This. That is information overload for a board that doesn't have ANY FR-S owners.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Titus

This. That is information overload for a board that doesn't have ANY FR-S owners.

---

Is it such a stretch to go from "Miata" to "FR-S"???

What am I describing: RWD, light, small displacement front engined motor a manual transmission, small-ish wheels/tires, low cost consumables, with a ~17:1 pounds per hp

Lots of folks on DFW Miata that don't even own Miatas, too.

I think there was that one guy that owned one for a couple weeks...

So this has become a Miata only board? Better talk to guys like KenO and all the other Time Trial guys that hang out here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by modernbeat

So this has become a Miata only board? Better talk to guys like KenO and all the other Time Trial guys that hang out here.

---

Ken just hangs around here to bully us Miata guys. He is mean....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by POS Racing

Ken just hangs around here to bully us Miata guys. He is mean....

---

Indeed. He once loaned me a nickel and said he'd break my arm if I didn't pay him a dime the next week!

It's not even close to a Miata only board. I think the gist might be that the post is super long, and terry doesn't really post here anymore, so the only things we can give him shit for are these updates. If he came around more, we could hassle him for regular stuff. I hear he quit being gay, so not sure he's welcome on a Miata board anymore...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fair!

Is it such a stretch to go from "Miata" to "FR-S"???

What am I describing: RWD, light, small displacement front engined motor a manual transmission, small-ish wheels/tires, low cost consumables, with a ~17:1 pounds per hp

Lots of folks on DFW Miata that don't even own Miatas, too.

---

There is nothing wrong with posting about a non-Miata project, but I would just suggest considering the audience before posting something bordering on a a novel. I would love to spend a few minutes reading about an FR-S project, but to invest an hour or more on something that I have only a passing interest in is not going to happen. Give me cliff notes and a link to the novel already on your site (and probably a few FR-S centric boards) and I will read it, and maybe even get interested enough to click through to read more details, and check out the products you are selling. As it was, I spent a minute scanning the pictures and moved on to reading about KenO's unrequited love for JJ.

I liked the post. Then again, I like build threads in general, the more detail the better.

I'm not gay (although I try, just can't pull it off), but I do have 2 Miatas. Can I still post?

Titus, most forums take a dim view of trying to steer traffic offsite. Hence you get the full copy here. Don't want to read it? Skip it.