I'd like to try turbo just to try it but I really enjoy my M45 even with the low boost and powercard piggy back ECU it's a very enjoyable and streetable car to drive. It would be a hard car for me honestly.
FI is still way far off for me. However, I thought I'd ask the turbo and SC people on this board: if you could start over today, would the people with SC's keep their SC or would they go with a turbo; would the people with turbos keep their turbo or go with a SC? And why?
SOLD - '91 BRG
SOLD -'99 Signal GreenLooking for my next car...
I'd like to try turbo just to try it but I really enjoy my M45 even with the low boost and powercard piggy back ECU it's a very enjoyable and streetable car to drive. It would be a hard car for me honestly.
2004 Saturn Ion Redline
Wrong Wheel Drive
1992 Grey MX-5
Right Wheel Drive
http://profile.imageshack.us/user/jeepinbanditride
Don't own a FI Miata but having owned various FI cars I like turbo better. Way more potential for power, ability to change boost without messing with a stupid pulley change but it does run hotter. Currently have 2 DI turbo cars and 1 s/c car, they are all fun.
VW Bug in running shoes
M Porcupine sedan
M Porcupine coupe
Crusty old e46 beater
Battery Powered appliance car
If I had to completely start over, I would go LS swap as well. With all the money I've spent on various kits, just to rip it all out and do it all over again multiple times, I'm in about as much as what I've been seeing complete swaps add up to. Selling the crap kits and parts recouped money, but eh.
If my only choices were turbo again or supercharger, turbo hands down.
I *would* like to get the wifey a Miata and throw a small SC on there, but there's no way I would pick that for my personal car over a turbo.
I love the instant torque of my supercharger and can't see ever trading it for a Turbo. Now an LS swap... that is another story!
An LS swap cost quite a bit more than your basic SC or turbo setup thought right? Several thousands more and quite a bit more work to do?
SOLD - '91 BRG
SOLD -'99 Signal GreenLooking for my next car...
I concur!!! I picked up my Miata in the first place just to do a Ls swap...I sold my 2001 z28 camaro and picked the Miata up...u can do a Ls swap for way less than alot of guys do...for instance..u can use the 5.3ltr out of the trucks and put the fast 92mm intake manifold off the cars and a nice small cam with headers and intake and tune and make about 390 to 400rwhp..with a t56 6 speed...i can get 5.3 full Pullouts very cheap so with buying the full eng I'll be about 5k in my full swap when done...And u can always
Upgrade to ls6 down the line after u work all the bugs out cuz all the parts off the 5.3 are
Interchangeable with the ls6
Once you figure in things like ECU, wide-band, gauges, clutch, exhaust, etc, a nice Turbo or Supercharger setup is going to run you around $6k-8k. An LS swap is going to run you between $12k and $20k depending on if you go salvage or buy everything new. Then you consider you can sell off your old drivetrain, so the gap gets a little closer. The LS swap is 10x the work.
Finish ur car rob so u can come play...we have another guy Travis that's been coming that makes around 240rwhp turbo Na..and he does pretty good..
Getting there. Now my car nights are wifey's car nights. All her parts are at the house, we're back from vacation, and once her car is done it's all about knocking mine out. I got over perfection for the time being, I want running.
She still wants to sell it and buy a Miata though. So the SC thing still might work out...anyone want a 2006 Chevy Cobalt? Brand new AC parts (every last damn piece of the system)![]()
This is lowest boost I can make on this spring:
http://i55.tinypic.com/2nb9jdl.jpg
It drives like a truck below 4000rpm, above that it pulls like a V8. The difference between what I've done with my car and 90% of the cars in this area is the attention to detail. I have the best parts money can buy, I have every part money can buy, and I will argue to the death that I have the best tune of any car in the world. It never makes the "woosh" turbo feeling like you think of when you see a T88 Supra on a dyno. I've spent the time tuning the car properly, respecting things like drivability, and it's great.
[QUOTE=CosmosMpower;245036Way more potential for power, ability to change boost without messing with a stupid pulley change but it does run hotter..[/QUOTE]
Does it? My EGT's are sub 1600*f. Every NA car I've seen also has a 15xx*f EGT. I've "raced" my car in 103*f heat, chasing a Panoz, tucked behind him, and never went north of 199*f on the water temp. I made an NA Miatas header glow orange last weekend on the dyno. No plastic parts melt in my car, the hood isn't burnt, and I can drive it in traffic.
The SBC swap sounds great for a street car, you still get a 200lb penalty and "soft" rear hubs that like to tragically fail at the track. I still haven't seen a V8 Miata other than John Roberts put a beating on us 250whp guys, and he has aero.
The moral of the story is that you can stroll down to TDR and get a reliable track car with a blower bolted on and be one of the many with 5+ years of great reliability. If you want the path to glory which I've taken, your best bet is ARTech in Wylie and get all the hot and cold side parts built for the same price, then do the rest yourself.
I had two turbo kits, because I could not get a "no electronics" MP62 for my 1991 w/ the '99 swap. The first turbo kit lasted about 3-laps, the current one wasn't much more expensive than the first, and it's the most gorgeous, over-engineered hunk of stainless steel you've seen in your life.
If you want examples of what I'd consider the "best paths to glory," you should look at tehJeffman's car and mine...sixAce will join this crew after I get MS on his car. Our cars are basically copies of each other on the dyno and track times, yet with different power-plants.
TXMC: Drinkin, shootin, racin!
Sorta depends on what you want as an end result. Under 200HP, I'd stick with my little M45 all day long and never look elsewhere. At 200-240 HP, You'll gets lots of arguments from both camps as to the better route to take. Above 250-ish HP, I think turbos have the edge. Seems 200HP is the magical number above which things start getting pretty spendy in terms of ancillary bits and pieces required.
If you want an LS motor--buy a Vette. That's where it belongs.
Speed
––––––––––––––––?? ?––––––––––––––––? ??––––
Don't look...there's nothing down here for you!
Wealth, power, and experience are apparently not enough to save us from social influences. Groupthink, as described by I.L.Janis, is the tendency for group members to reach a consensus opinion, even if that decision is downright stupid (Janis 1982).
There was a thread on this exact topic on miata.net. There were disciples of both camps but many more people had gone turbo from super than had gone super from turbo.
Like any question about "what's the best FI solution," it depends on how you intend to use it and what your requirements are. If you haven't put your toe in the water, it's pretty hard to make an educated determination of what you "require" / want. That's why it's a good idea to get a ride in a few different varieties so you can make that call.
Would have build the supercharge set up i have now, would have just done a built motor first, hate having to remove boost and back down the power to keep stock rods intact.
'94 Black & Black & Tan
'99 head swap, JR header, TDR intake & header blanket, MegaSquirt, RB hollow bar, Tein Flex, 15x8 6ULs, HD M2 Sport, FM cat, Borla cat-back, black '95M interior, MOMO Zebrano, IL Motorsport console...
Dyno Days
8/16/08 (bone stock): 103.1 hp/99.0 lb-ft - Dynojet
8/23/08 (Borla cat-back): 108.2 hp/104.1 lb-ft - Dynojet
8/13/11 (more stuff...): 126 hp/116 lb-ft - Mustang dyno
Roger Moore: the Danny White of James Bonds