I use Microsoft Millenium edition. It's awesome! More kick ass than all those others!
Yep, we bought a sexy little HP Mini with the 10" screen at Christmas. Allegedly the poor thing is unable to run Vista so it came with XP and no bloatware. It is rock solid stable. I'm still planning to bump it to 2 GB of ram but it runs pretty good with 1 even with the 2 of us using fast user switching. If it was just for me I'd have bought the Eeepc too but I had to getonboard with the good looking case and big keyboard.
I use Microsoft Millenium edition. It's awesome! More kick ass than all those others!
SOLD: 92 silver w/hardtop, voodoo, Kosei wheels, pine tree air freshener, and some JR stuff.
SOLD: 99 silver; the old Goodwin supercharged car with gobs of power and everything else on it.
SOLD: 95 triple black; stock
SOLD: 99 black and tan; loaded and clean; just hit 50k miles.
SOLD: 2006 Copper Mica Red; stock.
FOR SALE: 2007 Galaxy Grey Grand Touring; stock; 38k miles.
Windows ME FTW!
I agree that Macs are pricey, but I've become convinced that you get what you pay for in computers, to an extent. The biggest problem with Macs is the consumer has been sold on the idea that you need to buy a "fully loaded" model to get a good one, which is the case with most PC makers. The cheap base models suck. Entry-level Macs are already loaded. They would be like Lexus, which doesn't really offer a "stripped" base model.
PC's are cheaper and have more supported sofware. After 2 years on my $900 Macbook, I have not had a single problem, never frozen-up once, and I have not experienced a decline in performance as I often did with PC's. Whiel they certainly make faster/better versions today than 2 years ago, I don't feel like Macs "show their age" as much as PC's. My iMac is over 4 years old (PowerPC) and still works great and seems quite up-to-date.
The biggest mistake of a non-Mac person is believing that you need the Macbook Pro, or any of the pro-level Macs. If you aren't doing really serious data work, video editing, pro audio mixing/recording or other resource-hog applications, you'd never need a Pro.
Also, its hard to overstate the value of ignoring all the virus threats out there, as they don't affect Mac, by and large. I don't have to buy and run a bunch of "security" software. Love the Mac!
Polished Turd Racing
Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."
Whether or not the system itself is more secure is not the point. The point is that the threat of a Mac becoming infected with a virus is miniscule compared to a Windows machine. I have not had a single virus/malware/adware issue on any of my Macs ever (13+ years) nor have I ever used any anti-virus software...ever. There is no practical need.
'96 "R2 Limited" | On Minkara
'99 s/c - Sold | Club Roadster Calendar Car: August 2011 | Roadster Garage Roadster of the Week
I must chime in and say that when I bought my beast of a MacPro, Nex and I priced out building the same hardware in a "Hacintosh" and the price was within 3% I think. For me this will pay for itself with a few side gigs(If the side gigs start showing up again)
2005 Lava Orange MSM #601/1428
211 rwhp, 195 ft. lbs on 1/6/07
Yes, I agree it was within 3-5%, but in your case, as may be the case with other space hungry power users, the Mac case is the issue.
It has very limited expansion capabilities, in my opinion. It's a full tower case with 1 (one) 5.25" (ie CD/DVD ROM bay) and only 3 (three) 3.5" bays for hard drives. While that might be enough for some people, when I pay nearly $4000 for a workstation class machine, I want options. ( I say workstation since the thing has 2x Intel Xeon quad core CPUs and 10 GB of Ram) Graphic card and memory options are also more limited and come with a much higher price tag than a PC.
'06 RSX Type-S NBP
Actually the Pro has 2x5.25 slots and 4xHD bays. With the move to Intel the graphics options are the same as PC
2005 Lava Orange MSM #601/1428
211 rwhp, 195 ft. lbs on 1/6/07
I can't use a Windows machine for more than 5 minutes without wanting to put my fist through the monitor.
Then again, I'm not particularly computer-savvy. I know how to use the specific applications I need, and goof off online. I don't want a computer I have to be a tech-head to use. I want my computer to work like my TV: turn it on and it does what I expect. My iMac excels at this. No bulging forehead veins, no drama, it just does what I want it to. I also love that it takes maybe 10 seconds between pushing the power button and being able to actually use the thing, unlike most PCs I've used, which take 2 minutes to boot up.
I did some comparison shopping when I bought it, and it cost the same as a PC would've with the same features. For me, it was no contest. I'd have bought the Mac even if the PCs were half the price.
Oh, well I've got two sevens, and two sevens beats a frush.