Reply With Quoteyeah a fstb will help the cowl shake issue. i have it really bad i have a base model, so i have no underbody bracing....
It's a NEEEEEEWWWWWW CAR! (not really)
Ok, so it's not new but it feels like it. I finally did and alignment on it and put in my rollbar. I do all my own alignments and I've gotten pretty darn good at aligning miatas. I'm not sure if I'm 100% happy with the setup I've got on it, but I'm going to give it some more time before I decide to change it.
(with my weight in the drivers seat)
Camber: 2.3 front, 2.0 rear
Caster: Maxed out
Toe: 1/32" out front, 0 rear
2488lbs (1/3 tank gas, no rollbar (add 24lbs))
~2321 with rollbar, no me, and no gas (it's a pig!)
660 636
628 564
49.1% LF/RR
50.8% RF/LR
52%F
48%R
51.7%L
48.2%R
The car seems to be a little tail happy in hard transitions but hooks up well in hard sweepers.
The rollbar install wasn't bad. I was very glad I had the 12" drill bit. I did it in less than 4 hours from the first tool out, to the last tool put away. The only real trouble I had was the the passenger side rear mouning was too close to the frame rail at first. I had to elongate the holes a little to make everything fit. The car is definitely more stiff and composed. I really need a front STB now.
yeah a fstb will help the cowl shake issue. i have it really bad i have a base model, so i have no underbody bracing....
03 LS FM2ish TDR I/C
99 Disco, the go anywhere ride
Re: It's a NEEEEEEWWWWWW CAR! (not rea
Is that a typo, or did you really get 2.3 degrees of negative camber out of the front at stock ride height? Or are you running non-stock suspension components?Originally Posted by EvilSpeeder
Iain
"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing." - George Bernard Shaw
Re: It's a NEEEEEEWWWWWW CAR! (not rea
No, it's not a typo. I'm pretty sure the car has been in a minor incident before I got it as there is some overspray in some suspect places. That being said, I'm pretty sure the front subframe is a little tweaked as the adjusters aren't in the same place. I can get over 3deg on the drivers side but 2.3 is the max on the passenger side. I'm not really complaining, the incident seems to have changed the car in my favor.Is that a typo, or did you really get 2.3 degrees of negative camber out of the front at stock ride height? Or are you running non-stock suspension components?
That's quite impressive. That's about 7/10ths of a degree more than I've ever heard anyone get out of a stock NB.
Iain
"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing." - George Bernard Shaw
It's a '94...last time I checked that was an NA. :P
Yeah, but I've never heard of anyone getting over 2 degrees out of a stock NA, either. I'm just more familiar with C Stock NB alignments.
Iain
"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing." - George Bernard Shaw
You know, a portapower to the crossmember will fix that. I once fixed a SM front crossmember that way. It had +1 degree max when I started and right about 2 when I was done.
Where did you get corner weights
Since he works at a race shop, I'm guessing he has access to corner scales.Where did you get corner weights
Iain
"We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing." - George Bernard Shaw
HINT: Put 1/32" toe in for the rear (each side). The a-arm bushing are soft enough that the rear tends to toe out while driving HARD, causing your zero (static) to become toe out....makes the rear loose :)
MAD
92 Sunny 214k, 95 Dimples, 93 James Bondo, 92 SM (Speedie Jr)
Shelley, Apex, Tigger, Max, Baby(cats), Fluffy, Spot, and Peanut (mini horses), Cinnamon & Bitsy(dawgs)
MSR #1001, SCCA #208822Let's go racin'
Posting Permissions
