Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Compression ratio vs octane

  1. #1

    Default Compression ratio vs octane

    This summer I'm planning on buying new pistons and upping the compression ratio, probably to 10:1 or so. What octane are most of you guys running with compression ratios like that? I'm N/A and don't plan on ever going forced induction. I've searched but can't find a definitive answer.
    Thanks, Parker
    Rust-Oleum White 97

  2. #2
    Orange cones fear me. cone-cerned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Woodbine, Texas
    Posts
    4,684

    Default

    I would be surprised if there is a definitive answer. My answer is 91 octane. I live outside the Metromess, so I can buy E0, alcohol free gasoline. 93 octane is not available here in E0. The compression ratio of my engine is 10:1 and the timing is set to 10° BTDC. I am using the stock '94 ECU.
    Last edited by cone-cerned; 04-14-2016 at 08:30 PM.
    On the track, I am fearless.
    If you were as slow as me, you wouldn't be afraid either.

    1994 M Edition
    CSP 67

  3. #3

    Default

    I'm set at 12 BTDC, I don't think we have 91 in Plano, I'm pretty sure it's only 87, 89, and 93. I still run the stock ecu as well. Basically, I'm asking if 93 is okay with 10:1
    Rust-Oleum White 97

  4. #4

    Default

    A lot of newer engines have 10:1 and run just fine on 87. If your ecu and sensors are in good shape 93 is probably overkill.
    AnthonyS
    former owner of 4 NA Miatas
    94 Laguna Blue awaiting Ford 5.0 transplant
    Also have a 91 ZR-1 and 00 996 (911).

  5. #5

    Default

    Most new engines have knock sensors, but most na/NB don't, that I am aware of anyway. I've noticed NAs will start to ping in hot weather. For me, a few bucks each tank is worth knowing the engine is better protected, if not keeping the timing advanced depending on the ECU.
    Polished Turd Racing

    Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."

  6. #6
    Chassis Designer Ziggo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Melissa, TX
    Posts
    79

    Default

    There was a grassroots article recently that tested fuels in their CSP miata and found no benefit to the E0 fuels.

    The NB VVT motor has a knock sensor. I know cause I am using it. It took a little tuning to get it to filter correctly but it works great now. wouldn't be hard to grab one from a salvage yard and utilize it. If you are changing compression I would hope you are planning on running a standalone, and the good ones all have a knock sensor input.

  7. #7
    Orange cones fear me. cone-cerned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Woodbine, Texas
    Posts
    4,684

    Default

    I read the article, too. One car, with a Megasquirt, being tuned for each fuel by Megasquirt's Russ Patrick. And tested on Megasquirt's dyno. Then results were posted for the finished tune without any correction for temperatures of different runs. Their test has almost nothing in common with my situation. I'll stick with E0 until I see a test with stock ECU (no tuning) for each of the fuels.

    A Megasquirt is on my shopping list, but it will be a while before I can get one.
    On the track, I am fearless.
    If you were as slow as me, you wouldn't be afraid either.

    1994 M Edition
    CSP 67

  8. #8
    Chassis Designer Ziggo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Melissa, TX
    Posts
    79

    Default

    I wasn't really referring to the power. They found the same timing curve was best for both the 93 E10 and the 93 E0, indicating that they both have the same knock resistance. Which is to be expected really because that's how the octane rating is measured, by knock resistance in a reference motor.

    What gets interesting is that reference motor is fueled through the intake valves. For modern direct injection motors, the octane rating of ethanol fuels is through the roof, somewhere around 170 for E85, but since it's not tested like that you dont see the benefit on the label.

  9. #9

    Default

    Alright, thanks guys. I'll probably just run 89 to keep it safe.
    Rust-Oleum White 97

  10. #10

    Default

    Conversation took tangents, didn't it?

    My track car is a '95 with its original engine. It's been fitted with NB2 pistons and a '99 head giving a 10:1 CR. I always fill with 93 (except at Hallett where only 91 is available) and haven't had detonation issues. Data point.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hornetball View Post
    Conversation took tangents, didn't it?

    My track car is a '95 with its original engine. It's been fitted with NB2 pistons and a '99 head giving a 10:1 CR. I always fill with 93 (except at Hallett where only 91 is available) and haven't had detonation issues. Data point.
    Will the NB2 pistons work with an NA8 head? I can't see any reason why they wouldn't
    Rust-Oleum White 97

  12. #12

    Default

    I believe so, but you'd be doing a lot of work, while continuing to use an inferior head. Seems counterproductive.
    Polished Turd Racing

    Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OZMDD View Post
    I believe so, but you'd be doing a lot of work, while continuing to use an inferior head. Seems counterproductive.
    I'm a high school student on a tight budget, I can't afford a $300 head on top of the pistons and possibly machine work.
    Rust-Oleum White 97

  14. #14

    Default

    What autocross class will you run after the rebuild?
    1995 M Edition

  15. #15

    Default

    Unless you're engine is bad, I wouldn't even consider messing with pistons. If $300 is a deal-breaker, you should stop before you even start.
    Polished Turd Racing

    Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OZMDD View Post
    Unless you're engine is bad, I wouldn't even consider messing with pistons. If $300 is a deal-breaker, you should stop before you even start.
    Quit trying to quash his dreams... Meanie....

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by POS Racing View Post
    Quit trying to quash his dreams... Meanie....
    Haha thanks, and to answer him, yes, my rings and valve seals are bad. I'm burning a decent amount of oil. However, I have decided to go cheap and just get stock replacement rings for now and buy another exhaust cam to exhintake it when I replace the valve seals too.
    Thanks all
    Rust-Oleum White 97

Similar Threads

  1. WTB everything to swap 1.8 Torsen diff 4.3 ratio into 1993 NA
    By nealb in forum dfwMiata.com Classifieds
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 08:25 PM
  2. 100 octane
    By ken o in forum OTM Tech and Chat
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-19-2009, 07:42 AM
  3. Octane test yields stunning results
    By cam76034 in forum Bull
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-21-2009, 10:15 AM
  4. LINK, Fuel & Timing changes for DragStrip 103 octane
    By TurboDuane in forum FI Miata Tech & Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-04-2005, 03:17 PM
  5. Pistons and Compression Ratio
    By Mark52 in forum Miata Tech and Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-13-2004, 08:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •