Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: 2011 pax

  1. #1

    Default 2011 pax

    The new numbers are out

    http://www.scca-chicago.com/solo/indexes/

    The good news GS gets harder, the bad news HS gets a lot softer and ES gets harder (good news for me)

  2. #2
    Team Cheap Bastard
    President & Founder
    sammm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    6,457

    Default

    CS & ES got softer.

    CS - 2010 - .840
    2011 - .833

    ES - 2010 - .829
    2011 - .825

  3. #3

    Default

    You wish. All of stock classes got softer, but ES less so.

    edit
    All of the classes got softer except AM, EM and FSAE. Average change -.006
    Last edited by Robert; 11-12-2010 at 09:48 AM.

  4. #4
    Team Cheap Bastard
    President & Founder
    sammm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    6,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert View Post
    You wish. All of stock classes got softer, but ES less so.
    Autocross is stupid. I quit.

  5. #5

    Default

    Yea! STR got a break, maybe we can hang with the STS cars now! :)
    Polished Turd Racing

    Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."

  6. #6
    Obnoxious at any speed altiain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Far south Dallas (Austin)
    Posts
    10,458

    Default

    I'm still not sure why ST is lower than STX, considering that STX was won by an ST car this year. Stupid Civics.
    Iain

    "We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing." - George Bernard Shaw

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by altiain View Post
    I'm still not sure why ST is lower than STX, considering that STX was won by an ST car this year. Stupid Civics.
    Because you can run an ST Civic with more mods in STX

  8. #8

    Default

    Copied from another forum

    Here's another list showing % change YOY.

    Average % change is (0.71%) for all classes and (0.73%) when you remove the top/bottom 2 classes (remove largest outliers).

    Class % Change
    FJC (2.20%)
    SMF (1.72%)
    GP (1.53%)
    AS (1.52%)
    HS (1.49%)
    FS (1.19%)
    EP (1.15%)
    ASP (1.03%)
    CM (0.98%)
    DS (0.97%)
    FJB (0.96%)
    BS (0.94%)
    SM (0.91%)
    SSM (0.91%)
    DM (0.88%)
    CS (0.83%)
    DP (0.80%)
    F125 (0.73%)
    BM (0.73%)
    STX (0.72%)
    STR (0.71%)
    STU (0.71%)
    ESP (0.70%)
    BSP (0.69%)
    CP (0.69%)
    DSP (0.59%)
    CSP (0.58%)
    BP (0.57%)
    ST (0.49%)
    ES (0.48%)
    FP (0.46%)
    FM (0.44%)
    GS (0.37%)
    STS (0.36%)
    FSP (0.36%)
    SS (0.35%)
    FJA (0.35%)
    XP (0.34%)
    EM 0.33%
    FSAE 2.19%

  9. #9

    Default

    I'm buying an HS car.
    M3 is always the answer.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sammm View Post
    Autocross is stupid. I quit.
    +1!

  11. #11

    Default

    Looking at my M3. I can run in STU or BSP.
    In BSP on Hoosier A6s on a 60 second course Hoosiers are only 1.26 seconds faster according to PAX? NO!
    I ran Hoosiers at the BMW event and was 2.7 ahead of Thomas, 1.3 ahead of Kenny, 2.6 of Jim.
    I don't think the ST? PAX is accurate with R-Comp classes.
    M3 is always the answer.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ken o View Post
    I'm buying an HS car.
    You already did. Steal your son's car.

  13. #13
    Obnoxious at any speed altiain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Far south Dallas (Austin)
    Posts
    10,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert View Post
    Because you can run an ST Civic with more mods in STX
    Really the only thing you can do in STX that you can't do in ST is move up to 15x8/9" wheels and add a diff. Yet every time someone tries this, they don't go any faster.

    The car that won STX this year was an ST car in ST trim. ST was faster than STX at 6 out of 8 National Tours this year*. I don't care that ST is "supposed to be" a slower class than STX - it isn't. The Civics are 700+ pounds lighter than anything else in the class, and they have a significantly better tire/weight ratio than anything else in class, which really matters when you're dealing with street tires.

    Oh well. At least the '12 re-org will stop them from cherry picking STX. Hopefully after the re-org we can get the PAX numbers right as well.

    • Dixie – ST - 115.207, STX - 115.433
    • Texas – ST - 168.127, STX - 169.936
    • San Diego – ST - 95.725, STX – 96.361
    • Wendover – ST – 103.433, STX – 105.244
    • Blytheville – ST – 110.344, STX – 108.800 STX finally wins one!
    • Peru – ST – 99.374, STX – 100.822
    • Finger Lakes – ST – 162.498, STX – 162.421  STX wins again… by .077 seconds
    • Packwood – ST – 105.934, STX – 107.089
    • Nationals – ST – 125.156, STX – 124.804  STX wins again… except it’s won by an ST car. The fastest “real” STX car is 125.645, behind the ST winner
    • *Blytheville #2 – ST – 113.440, STX – 106.044 (I’m not counting this one, since the sole ST entrant was more than seven seconds off the pace. Not a legitimate data point imho)
    Iain

    "We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing." - George Bernard Shaw

  14. #14

    Default

    You just need to put 6in wide wheels and an open diff in the RX8

    With the current classing STX has to have a harder PAX than ST.

    I agree that some of the numbers are strange when you look at stock vs. ST, vs. SP

    edit

    looking at the rules make that 7.5 wheels with 225 tires.
    Last edited by Robert; 11-12-2010 at 11:31 AM.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by altiain View Post
    I don't care that ST is "supposed to be" a slower class than STX - it isn't.
    The fact is Rick Ruth tends to look at is what the class "should be" running and STX has not lived up to it's potential. I think STXs pax is right where it needs to be.

    Quote Originally Posted by altiain View Post
    (the EF civics) have a significantly better tire/weight ratio than anything else in class, which really matters when you're dealing with street tires.
    To start with there really isn't a big difference:
    BMW/RX8 2750lbs on 265mm tires = 2.59lbs per mm
    EF Civic 1950lbs on 195mm tires = 2.50lbs per mm

    But even then there are cars in STX that have much better tire/weight than the EF civic:
    Integra Type R 2350lbs on 245 tires = 2.39lbs per mm
    240SX 2400lbs on 265mm tires = 2.26lbs per mm

    BMWs and RX8s make great daily drivers/weekend racers but even after the reorg they still won't be the cars to have IMHO.

    Quote Originally Posted by altiain View Post
    Hopefully after the re-org we can get the PAX numbers right as well.
    Don't get your hopes up. For 6 years STS (formerly STS2) had a harder pax even though it was ALWAYS slower than ST (formerly STS). Rick Ruth kept the PAX at the class' potential and it took STS 6 years to catch up...

Similar Threads

  1. Miatas@Hallett - Sept. 16-17, 2011
    By black roadster in forum Open Track
    Replies: 213
    Last Post: 09-20-2011, 11:26 PM
  2. 2011 gt 5.0
    By ken o in forum Bull
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-04-2010, 03:36 PM
  3. New RX-7 by 2011
    By sammm in forum OTM Tech and Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-05-2010, 01:52 PM
  4. 2011 Super Bowl headed for Arlington
    By POS Racing in forum Bull
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-25-2007, 02:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •