http://www.scca-chicago.com/solo/indexes/rtp2010.html
http://sccaforums.com/forums/ShowThr...=390687#390687
Printable View
How does GS end up with a softer pax? ::Rant::
Stupid ::Censor:: autocross!
'Cause the Mini S finally moved to DS?Quote:
Originally Posted by sammm
Time to get the wife's Civic some better tires! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by sammm
dang thought my slow times would have given BSP a softer pax ;)
http://www.mouseattack.org/pics/autox/rtp2010.jpg
Here are the 2008 and 2009 changes as well:
http://www.mouseattack.org/pics/autox/rtp2009.jpg
http://www.mouseattack.org/pics/autox/rtp2008.jpg
Just to clarify the chart the old AS/new BS only went up .004.:D
Man did GS get a softer PAX.
Did the Genesis stay in GS?
Step away from the car Ken. We know what your thinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by ken o
Muh who hah ha ha ha
well I suppose I could go back to TGS or GS, but that would mean losing the coilovers, or every other modification I have on the car that actually makes it fun to drive.
That's the thing that sucks about SCCA sometimes. I wouldn't take parts of the car to conform unless you want to run a bunch of tours and nationals in your car. You already spent the money to make the car more enjoyable, no sense in going backwards.Quote:
Originally Posted by 762
If I keep the Elise I'm getting aftermarket control arms to get some real camber in the front, forget Stock class.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
That's what's nice about SCCA I don't have to lower the car and put super stiff spring on it to be completive but if I do theirs a class for it. Do what ever you have the most fun at. Now if we could only get rid of Rcomps in stock.
It's called Tire Class. ;) I like running stock...it levels the playing field for the most part. Once you leave it's a never ending money pit if you want to remain competitive. ::2Cents::Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert
Hoosiers are so cheap.
Personally I'd like Stock to mean that. No catback, no shocks, nothing but street tire (and yes, I know about the ST* street tire fiasco).
I'd also like "stock car racing" to be just that again, but that's a whole nuther subject.
So what's wrong with ST?Quote:
Originally Posted by 762
There is nothing wrong with ST, just that the GTI is not really that competitive in STX, unless I really dedicated prepping the car to the limits of the class, which will just not happen due to budget constraints.
Maybe if I was a fantastic driver I would be able to overcome the gap, but as it stands now. A mediocre me is not fast enough to make up the difference.
That's pretty much true for any car/class. You have to prep to the limits of the class rules. That's why I like stock because their is so little you can (have) to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by 762
So what are you looking for, a 762 Class where everyone drives Rabbits with soft-sprung coilovers?
Hs ftw!!