Mathematical ponderings on FM spring rates...
Whilst re-assembling my suspension, 3bean seemed almost distraught when I re-attached my front sway bar on the softer setting... I gave the quick-simple answer "I want to try it."
I hadn't done quite all the math at the time, but...
Assuming Racing Beat isn't pulling our legs with their 28%/23% rate increase claim, the stock '02 suspension is:
162/118 f/r in lbs/inch.
FM springs are 342/228 lbs/inch f/r for an increase of 111%/93%.
With greater stiffness increase in the front than rear, the loose characteristics of my car should be addressed... So I should be able to run a softer front bar and have the same front/rear balance... We'll see come the end of February unless I get a wild hair and run up to Oklahoma for the beginning of February.
You engineering types may feel free to pick apart my off-hand analysis at will... I do realize that the spring rate comparison doesn't take into account changes in roll center, etc.
However, the car feels great. Steering response is phenomenal. bean will attest that I was fascinated by the lack of nose-dive under heavy braking...
And steering effort is much lighter, but that may be due signifcantly to the softer bar setting.
Re: Mathematical ponderings on FM spring rates...
Quote:
Originally Posted by tailchaser
You engineering types may feel free to pick apart my off-hand analysis at will... I do realize that the spring rate comparison doesn't take into account changes in roll center, etc...
If you have not seen this on the :batman: board.
An Excel spreadsheet with all the roll center and spring rates calculations you can think of. (Sway bar rates also)
I did not write this. Document credits author.
If you can understand this monster maybe we can have a class some day.