Hey.. I'm worth way more than two-fitty...
Printable View
I feel so loved!
http://www.qwantz.com/fanart/love.jpg
You can have Dave04 but I get to keep his little Honduh.
I've already got a box to keep it in.
OK so here's a question: are manufacturers starting to under-rate their cars' HP numbers? Here's a dyno sheet for a stock Civic Si making MORE than the advertised crank HP at the wheels.
These results appear to be fairly typical. What gives? :scratch:
http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f1...E/CIMG0472.jpg
S.
I hinted at that in my dyno thread. I've seen that dyno plot before, and something is fishy about it.
The higher line also looks like something was added to make it spike that much higher than the other lines.
Here's a good read if you're bored. Church Automotive is a well-known RSX shop; I'm sure they are doing Si's by now as well.
Dynojet vs Dynapack
And another good thread about Dynapack numbers...
Click
Sounds like the shops that use Dynapack need to make sure they learn how to set them up (on the software end of it) and calibrate them properly.
Hey Matt... You get your car yet???
::Fruity::
The question I have is... I know the SAE changed how to calculate horsepower and the automakers changed to that new standard... but did the the local dyno guys get updated software for their equipment?
They don't have to. The SAE numbers force the manufacturers into testing a "complete" engine assembly, ie with accessories on it (PS pump, A/C compressor, and alternator). A dyno just calculates HP/TQ through physics ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave04