Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Spec Miata rule changes and their effect on 99-00 heads

  1. #1

    Default Spec Miata rule changes and their effect on 99-00 heads

    If you are a MazdaSpeed member, you probably got a lengthy email about coming changes to SPEC Miata. (Letter below for those that did not get it)

    The important things to note is:
    • Majority of SPEC Miata racers have been running illegal heads
    • They will still be able to run them during the 2015 season but will take a weight penalty for it
    • They will have to go to a completely stock head for the 2015 Runnoffs and all races after that.


    So what does this mean for non-racers?

    A large percentage of SPEC Miatas these days are 99/00 cars. Most racers have more than one head. The vast majority of them are not stock, and will need to be replaced with stock ones. They can't buy a new one from Mazda, so 100s of used stock heads will need to change hands in the next year. If you have one, realize you have a valuable asset. Additionally, you can expect 100s of lightly modified/blueprinted heads will be hitting the market. Expect their prices to be good. IF you have a 99/00 Miata with a stock head, you might find yourself in a position to offer a SPEC racer a swap + cash. Good times!







    TO: Spec Miata Participants
    FR: SCCA, NASA and Mazda Spec Miata Leadership Team
    RE: Class Intent, Direction and Regulations
    DT: November 5, 2014
    Spec Miata purpose and intent (SCCA General Competition Rules):
    The Spec Miata (SM) class is intended to provide the membership with the opportunity to compete in low cost, production-based cars with limited modifications, suitable for racing competition.
    The rules are intentionally designed to be more open than the Showroom Stock class but more restricted than the Improved Touring class.
    Less than 15 years ago, the concept of Spec Miata was born. The essence of the class focused on a low cost, fun, competitive environment that was relatively easy to enter. If a participant found a good donor car, added safety equipment, a hardtop and a bolt-on kit of performance parts purchased through Mazdaspeed Motorsports Development, they would have equipment capable of racing at the front of the field.
    Throughout the years, the class veered from the original intent and direction. The scope of the class has crept into something beyond its original intent. While the essence of the class may remain the same, in some respects, it has lost its way, pushing the definition of "limited modifications" and the notion of "low cost." Mazda, SCCA and NASA all agree that changes must be made for the long-term health of the class, regardless of which sanctioning body operates the races.
    The 2014 SCCA National Championship Runoffs was a watershed moment in the history of the Spec Miata class. With so many cars found out of compliance at the front of the field, a working group was established by Mazda, SCCA and NASA leadership to evaluate not just cylinder head rules, but the purpose and long-term goal of the class overall. The group, established by SCCA President Lisa Noble, also includes John Doonan, Steve Sanders and Mike Allen (Mazdaspeed Motorsports Development), John Mueller (NASA), Tony Ave (SCCA Club Racing Board) and Robert Clarke (SCCA Pro Racing/SCCA Inc.).
    The group met face-to-face at SCCA's offices in Topeka, Kansas October 30, 2014. Also attending in consultation were: Eric Prill (SCCA), John Bauer (SCCA), Jim Wheeler (SCCA Club Racing Board), Steve Knapp (Elite Engines) and Jim Stewart (Stewart Engines).
    Long-term Goal of the working group:
    For Spec Miata to be a healthy, growing and economical class across organizations, where a racer can be competitive utilizing a stock Mazda Miata that is enhanced with bolt-on performance parts acquired through Mazdaspeed Motorsports Development.
    In achieving that goal, it is important that current participants not be disenfranchised and unreasonably burdened while still making the class attractive to individuals that have either left the class or not engaged in the class due to scope creep away from stock.
    The most critical issue in conflict with the long-term goal is with regard to rules that permit modifications to the stock cylinder head and the method with which these are being modified. Current SM rules permit cylinder head modifications beyond the level of more "radical" categories, including, but not limited to, SCCA Production and Super Touring® Lite. It needs to be stated that the heads examined at the Runoffs were modified on varying levels, but each head found out of compliance was in violation of the rules as they are written. Additionally, this is not simply an issue with de-burring, but rather actual smoothing, blending and porting on the sharp edge from the plunge cut.
    To achieve the long-term goal, the class must ultimately return to stock cylinder heads with a permitted industry-standard valve job.
    Recognizing the number of modified (both compliant and non-compliant per the current rules) cylinder heads in the community, the expense to replace these and potential parts availability concerns, the group agrees to the following path, with details to be finalized no later than the December 14 SCCA Board of Directors meeting:
    - Permit plunge cuts and unshrouding per the current rules, but with clarification of concentricity, as well as some level of blending of the plunge cut (language TBA). These modifications may require that additional weight be added to the car.
    - Independent testing will be conducted to determine the effect of the individual and collective modifications. Only once this scientific data is collected and evaluated will weight levels be determined.
    - Weight additions will compensate for the power gains from the head modifications, while also encouraging the behavior of changing back to an unmodified head as soon as possible.
    - The allowance of these modifications will have a sunset period of one to two years, based on parts availability. The intention is for this to happen sooner than later, but with appropriate competitor notification.
    - Only un-modified heads would be permitted for competition at the 2015 SCCA National Championship Runoffs.
    Additionally, the group unanimously desires greater resources and efforts with regard to season-long compliance checks. Collectively, it is developing an enhanced compliance program to address this. The group will also evaluate class parity and additional concepts to ensure parity and compliance moving forward.
    Timing: The working group welcomes input, which can be submitted through SCCA's www.clubracingboard.comsite or NASA's John Mueller at [email protected]. A final recommendation of the group, with the support of all involved parties, will be presented to the SCCA Board of Directors and NASA leadership for approval in December.
    At its October meeting, the SCCA Board of Directors unanimously passed the following motion: SCCA Board of Directors directs SCCA Staff and CRB to jointly develop with Mazda and NASA a rule set and timeline to address the Miata engine preparation. This may include recommendations around protest, appeals and teardown in the GCR for Spec Miata.

    Summary: The working group believes that this structure achieves the long-term goal, while addressing short-term concerns. Drivers with modified components that need time to perform the necessary changes will be able to compete at a reasonable level in the short term, with the class as a whole driving together toward a better long-term goal.

    For the sport,
    Lisa Noble, SCCA President and CEO
    John Doonan, Mazda Motorsports Director
    John Mueller, NASA Spec Miata National Director
    Robert Clarke, SCCA Pro Racing President/SCCA VP of Business Development
    Tony Ave, SCCA Club Racing Board
    Steve Sanders, MAZDASPEED Motorsports Development Manager
    Mike Allen, MAZDASPEED Motorsports Development Specialist

  2. #2

    Default

    Thanks Titus! Going to think about separating the head after all!
    Polished Turd Racing

    Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."

  3. #3

    Default

    I think majority of spec miata heads being illegal is a bit of a stretch. Maybe at the front end at runoffsd but majority of spec miatas are not NBs and there are several builders of 1.8 NBs that did not exploit rule. Yeah they closed the loophole with the group protest but there are hundreds of drivers not running top end build NB lumps and plenty of 1.6 cars where plunge cut did not even apply.
    don't get all Fox News with this but NB heads will be fetchin hard top premiums.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve E View Post
    I think majority of spec miata heads being illegal is a bit of a stretch. Maybe at the front end at runoffsd but majority of spec miatas are not NBs and there are several builders of 1.8 NBs that did not exploit rule. Yeah they closed the loophole with the group protest but there are hundreds of drivers not running top end build NB lumps and plenty of 1.6 cars where plunge cut did not even apply.
    don't get all Fox News with this but NB heads will be fetchin hard top premiums.
    I have since read that this head treatment was also common on 1.6 heads too. The numbers go up even higher when you consider than many regional racers don't spend the cash on a complete pro built motor, but will splurge on a pro head. From what I have read, the heads found to be illegal at the runoffs represented 3 of the top builders. IIRC, I saw one racer speculate that these 3 builders sold north of 2000 heads in the last 3-4 years. That number sounds high to me, but no one argued the figure.

    It seems to me that a big part of the problem is going to be that most racers don't even know if their head is legal or not, and many don't have the skill to properly tear down, inspect, and reassemble their head on their own to check. It might be cheaper and easier for them to err on the side of caution and just go ahead and replace the head (unless of course prices get crazy on them). It would be nice if all the builders would come forward and state publicly if they were using the illegal techniques and when they started doing it, but I doubt that will happen.

  5. #5

    Default

    I have a stock 99 head on my car if a Spec racer wants to make it worth my while to swap.
    ...and across the line.

    1996 Mazda Miata - R-Package (Eve-L)
    2012 Mazda CX-9 - Grand Touring (Dory)




  6. #6

    Default

    ^this
    Polished Turd Racing

    Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."

  7. #7

    Default

    NB heads are available from mazdacomp and are currently on sale as of yesterday.

  8. #8

    Default

    darn.

    Edit: $699 for just the bare head. I think my motor is still a good value at $1k
    Last edited by OZMDD; 11-21-2014 at 01:36 PM.
    Polished Turd Racing

    Mick wrote: "I think Jerrett is the best autocrosser I have ever seen naked."

  9. #9

    Default

    Interesting... I wonder if they had some held back, or if they have cast more?

  10. #10

    Default

    Mazdacomp are good folks. A month or so ago they still had 1.6 crates. The stuff they continue to carry is amazing.

  11. #11

    Default

    I will sell this whole car for $2000 to a member here. It is on Craigslist for $2250......... I don't really want to part it out but may..... 99, 5speed, Torsen, 118K, runs great
    Attached Images Attached Images

Similar Threads

  1. Craigslist heads up 1999 miata $2400!
    By Bluegs03 in forum dfwMiata.com Classifieds
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-13-2012, 09:23 PM
  2. '93 Spec Miata
    By rgreeny in forum dfwMiata.com Classifieds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-10-2011, 04:53 PM
  3. Need Spec Miata Help
    By dickie in forum Bull
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-13-2010, 06:22 PM
  4. WTB: Spec Miata
    By ken o in forum dfwMiata.com Classifieds
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-25-2008, 07:23 AM
  5. MSM VS spec Miata
    By bigDstars in forum Open Track
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-06-2005, 08:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •